[PM-13349] Hide edit button unless item is in at least one non-readOnly collection

[mpbw2]

Hide edit button unless item is in at least one non-readOnly collection

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-13349

📔 Objective

Hide the edit button (FAB) if an item is in a readOnly collection, or in the case of multiple collections at least one has to be non-readOnly or the button remains hidden.

📸 Screenshots

Item view from within non-readOnly (editable) collection:

Item view from within readOnly (non-editable) collection:

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – e5667010-199e-4a0d-a9df-eed4547d773e

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

[eliykat]

The server evaluates this business logic for you and sets the result in the cipher.edit property.

• true if the user can edit the item
• false if the item is read-only

This takes into account whether it's in the user's individual vault vs. organization (and if organization, what collection permissions apply).

I'm not familiar with mobile, but it looks like it's available on the SDK model: https://github.com/bitwarden/sdk-internal/blob/main/crates/bitwarden-vault/src/cipher/cipher.rs#L82

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.44444% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.86%. Comparing base (8bde874) to head (f566b45).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...warden/ui/vault/feature/item/VaultItemViewModel.kt	37.50%	0 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4430      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.87%   88.86%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         460      460              
  Lines       39899    39907       +8     
  Branches     5685     5690       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        35462    35465       +3     
  Misses       2457     2457              
- Partials     1980     1985       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mpbw2]

The server evaluates this business logic for you and sets the result in the cipher.edit property.

Thanks for the heads up on this @eliykat