Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement filteration by rootProcessInstanceId for Process Instances and History Process instances endpoints #2582 #4925

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prakashpalanisamy
Copy link
Contributor

For the /process-instance & history/process-instance APIs, Have implemented the root-process-instance filters to get the Process instances related to the provided root-process-instance.

Git Issue: #2582

Copy link
Contributor

@joaquinfelici joaquinfelici left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @prakashpalanisamy ,

Thanks for the contribution! The changes look really good overall, I left one comment regarding the formatting changes in the Execution.xml file.

Before I continue my review, I will duplicate your PR to run our CI on it to make sure no regressions were introduced. In the meantime, did you test this manually?

Thanks you.

Copy link
Contributor

@joaquinfelici joaquinfelici left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ CI is green.
✅ My manual tests are ok for both runtime and historic.

Please revert unnecessary changes to the Execution.xml file and I think we're good to go.

Thank you!

@prakashpalanisamy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joaquinfelici Thank you for spending time on this. Please give me some time to look into your inputs. And yes I did manual tests as part of the code change as well.

@kayhern kayhern force-pushed the feature/git-issue-2582-filter-pid-by-rootProcessInstanceId branch from d89006d to 96c55fd Compare March 5, 2025 14:10
@prakashpalanisamy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joaquinfelici I made the changes and re-requested review. Please review when you get time. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants