chore(deps): update dependency duende.accesstokenmanagement to 3.2.0 [security]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
Duende.AccessTokenManagement (source)	3.1.1 -> 3.2.0

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2025-26620

Summary

Duende.AccessTokenManagement contains a race condition when requesting access tokens using the client credentials flow. Concurrent requests to obtain an access token using differing protocol parameters can return access tokens obtained with the wrong scope, resource indicator, or other protocol parameters. Such usage is somewhat atypical, and only a small percentage of users are likely to be affected.

Details

Duende.AccessTokenManagement can request access tokens using the client credentials flow in several ways. In basic usage, the client credentials flow is configured once and the parameters do not vary. In more advanced situations, requests with varying protocol parameters may be made by calling specific overloads of these methods:

• HttpContext.GetClientAccessTokenAsync()
• IClientCredentialsTokenManagementService.GetAccessTokenAsync()

There are overloads of both of these methods that accept a TokenRequestParameters object that customizes token request parameters. However, concurrent requests with varying TokenRequestParameters will result in the same token for all concurrent calls.

Upgrading

Most users can simply update the NuGet package to the latest version. Customizations of the IClientCredentialsTokenCache that derive from the default implementation (DistributedClientCredentialsTokenCache) will require a small code change, as its constructor was changed to add a dependency on the ITokenRequestSynchronization service. The synchronization service will need to be injected into the derived class and passed to the base constructor.

Impact

The impact of this vulnerability depends on how Duende.AccessTokenManagement is used and on the security architecture of the solution. Most users will not be vulnerable to this issue. More advanced users may run into this issue by calling the methods specified above with customized token request parameters. The impact of obtaining an access token with different than intended protocol parameters will vary depending on application logic, security architecture, and the authorization policy of the resource servers.

Thank you to Michael Dimoudis of PageUp for finding this issue and responsibly disclosing it!

---

Release Notes

DuendeSoftware/foss (Duende.AccessTokenManagement)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[github-actions]

Trivy image scan report

ghcr.io/chgl/fhir-server-exporter:pr-302 (ubuntu 24.04)

No Vulnerabilities found

No Misconfigurations found

opt/fhir-server-exporter/FhirServerExporter.deps.json

No Vulnerabilities found

No Misconfigurations found

opt/fhir-server-exporter/packages.lock.json

No Vulnerabilities found

No Misconfigurations found

usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App/9.0.2/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.deps.json

No Vulnerabilities found

No Misconfigurations found

usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/9.0.2/Microsoft.NETCore.App.deps.json

No Vulnerabilities found

No Misconfigurations found

[github-actions]

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Elapsed time
✅ ACTION	actionlint	3		0	0.04s
✅ CSHARP	csharpier	5	2	0	0.96s
✅ CSHARP	dotnet-format	yes	yes	no	26.6s
✅ CSHARP	roslynator	3	0	0	34.02s
✅ DOCKERFILE	hadolint	1		0	0.11s
✅ EDITORCONFIG	editorconfig-checker	45		0	0.12s
✅ JSON	jsonlint	13		0	0.3s
✅ JSON	prettier	13	3	0	1.75s
✅ JSON	v8r	13		0	6.06s
✅ MARKDOWN	markdownlint	2	0	0	0.92s
✅ REPOSITORY	checkov	yes		no	18.68s
✅ REPOSITORY	dustilock	yes		no	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	git_diff	yes		no	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	grype	yes		no	11.32s
✅ REPOSITORY	kics	yes		no	10.02s
✅ REPOSITORY	secretlint	yes		no	0.66s
✅ REPOSITORY	syft	yes		no	1.3s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy	yes		no	6.41s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy-sbom	yes		no	0.1s
✅ REPOSITORY	trufflehog	yes		no	1.82s
✅ YAML	prettier	15	0	0	0.84s
✅ YAML	v8r	15		0	10.85s
✅ YAML	yamllint	15		0	0.56s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

You could have same capabilities but better runtime performances if you request a new MegaLinter flavor.

• Click here to request the new flavor

[chgl]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.3.30 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀