Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add python code samples check #258

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Add python code samples check #258

merged 12 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

invader89
Copy link
Collaborator

@invader89 invader89 commented Nov 21, 2024

Add workflow step to validate python code snippets
So we would keep codesnippets consistent.
In case if pipeline fails we can just run script locally and it will fix all the files and we can add those to the PR

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

@invader89 invader89 mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2024
@invader89 invader89 changed the base branch from main to make-codesnippets-black-compatible November 21, 2024 15:52
@invader89 invader89 marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 15:24
@invader89 invader89 requested review from a team as code owners November 25, 2024 15:24
Base automatically changed from make-codesnippets-black-compatible to main November 25, 2024 17:03
@invader89 invader89 force-pushed the add-python-code-samples-check branch from aafa27b to 60e6793 Compare November 25, 2024 17:44
Copy link

@invader89 invader89 force-pushed the add-python-code-samples-check branch from 60e6793 to 350f567 Compare November 25, 2024 19:34
Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

@invader89 invader89 merged commit affc0c4 into main Nov 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@invader89 invader89 deleted the add-python-code-samples-check branch November 26, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants