Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VanDantzig-2011-Sensorimotor #241

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MiraAhmedovic
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding VanDantzig-2011-Sensorimotor based on van Dantzig et al. (2011) "A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items", closes #214.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AnnikaTjuka AnnikaTjuka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, this looks like a dataset that contains an association network. We need a different approach here because ideally we also want a mapping of “Concept 1” and “Concept 2” to Concepticon concept sets.

@@ -70,4 +70,5 @@ Bonin-2018-Concreteness Bonin, Patrick and Méot, Alain and Bugaiska, Aurélia 2
Coso-2023-Emotions Ćoso, Bojana and Guasch, Marc and Bogunovic, Irena and Ferré, Pilar and Hinojosa, José A. 2023 ratings English Croatian https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02003-2 Coso2023 This list contains ratings of five concrete emotions ("happiness", "anger", "sadness", "fear", "disgust") for 3000+ Croatian words. All ratings were given on a 5-point scale. While the original study was conducted with Croatian words, the present mapping is based on the English translations given for these items. CROWD-5e
Repetto-2023-Sensorimotor Repetto, Claudia and Rodella, Claudia and Conca, Francesca and Santi, Gaia Chiara and Catricalá, Eleonora 2023 ratings English Italian https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02004-1 Repetto2023 This list contains ratings of valence, arousal, dominance, familiarity, imageability and concreteness on a 9-point scale. Further, five effectors (hand-arm, foot-leg, torso, mouth, head) as well as six perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste, vision, and interoception) were rated on a 6-point scale. Exclusivity ratings for perception, action and overall sensorimotor values were given ranging from 0-1, to be interpreted as percentages.
Syssau-2009-Valence Syssau, Arielle and Monnier, Catherine 2009 ratings English, French French https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.213 Syssau2009 This list contains ratings of valence given by children age five, age seven and age nine for 600 French items. The data comprise the percentage distribution of children within each respective age group who provided ratings on a scale ranging from negative to neutral to positive, with each age group being treated as making up 100%. It is additionally divided by gender (male, female). The present list further contains ratings of the same items given by adults in [Syssau and Font (2005)](:bib:Syssau2005). The items were chosen based on the emotional databases by [Bonin, Méot et al. 2003](:bib:Bonin2003) and [Syssau and Font (2005)](:bib:Syssau2005), licensed as Emotional Source in the dataset. While these original studies were conducted using pictures, the present study used only the corresponding words, either spoken (age group five) or written (age groups seven and nine).
VanDantzig-2011-Sensorimotor Van Dantzig, Saskia and Cowell, Rosemary A and Zeelenberg, René and Pecher, Diane 2011 ratings English English https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0038-8 VanDantzig2011 This list contains ratings of five perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste and vision) rated on a 5-point scale, as well as familiarity ratings ranging from 0-1, to be interpreted as percentages. The list considers a property alongside two concepts (concept 1, concept 2), focusing on whether the concepts associated with the same property are experienced differently and whether there is a dominant perceptual modality linked to a property. Notably, in giving their ratings participants never encountered the same propoerty or concept more than once. The original study further contains perceptual modality ratings according to norms established by [Lynott and Conell (2009)](:bib:Lynott2009) which were omitted here.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: "propoerty"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items
3 participants