VanDantzig-2011-Sensorimotor

datasets.tsv

@@ -70,4 +70,5 @@ Bonin-2018-Concreteness	Bonin, Patrick and Méot, Alain and Bugaiska, Aurélia	2
 Coso-2023-Emotions	Ćoso, Bojana and Guasch, Marc and Bogunovic, Irena and Ferré, Pilar and Hinojosa, José A.	2023	ratings	English	Croatian	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02003-2	Coso2023	This list contains ratings of five concrete emotions ("happiness", "anger", "sadness", "fear", "disgust") for 3000+ Croatian words. All ratings were given on a 5-point scale. While the original study was conducted with Croatian words, the present mapping is based on the English translations given for these items.	CROWD-5e
 Repetto-2023-Sensorimotor	Repetto, Claudia and Rodella, Claudia and Conca, Francesca and Santi, Gaia Chiara and Catricalá, Eleonora	2023	ratings	English	Italian	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02004-1	Repetto2023	This list contains ratings of valence, arousal, dominance, familiarity, imageability and concreteness on a 9-point scale. Further, five effectors (hand-arm, foot-leg, torso, mouth, head) as well as six perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste, vision, and interoception) were rated on a 6-point scale. Exclusivity ratings for perception, action and overall sensorimotor values were given ranging from 0-1, to be interpreted as percentages.
 Syssau-2009-Valence	Syssau, Arielle and Monnier, Catherine	2009	ratings	English, French	French	https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.213	Syssau2009	This list contains ratings of valence given by children age five, age seven and age nine for 600 French items. The data comprise the percentage distribution of children within each respective age group who provided ratings on a scale ranging from negative to neutral to positive, with each age group being treated as making up 100%. It is additionally divided by gender (male, female). The present list further contains ratings of the same items given by adults in [Syssau and Font (2005)](:bib:Syssau2005). The items were chosen based on the emotional databases by [Bonin, Méot et al. 2003](:bib:Bonin2003) and [Syssau and Font (2005)](:bib:Syssau2005), licensed as Emotional Source in the dataset. While these original studies were conducted using pictures, the present study used only the corresponding words, either spoken (age group five) or written (age groups seven and nine).
+VanDantzig-2011-Sensorimotor	Van Dantzig, Saskia and Cowell, Rosemary A and Zeelenberg, René and Pecher, Diane	2011	ratings	English	English	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0038-8	VanDantzig2011	This list contains ratings of five perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste and vision) rated on a 5-point scale, as well as familiarity ratings ranging from 0-1, to be interpreted as percentages. The list considers a property alongside two concepts (concept 1, concept 2), focusing on whether the concepts associated with the same property are experienced differently and whether there is a dominant perceptual modality linked to a property. Notably, in giving their ratings participants never encountered the same propoerty or concept more than once. The original study further contains perceptual modality ratings according to norms established by [Lynott and Conell (2009)](:bib:Lynott2009) which were omitted here.
 Dingemanse-2020-IconicityHumor	Dingemanse, Mark and Thompson, Bill	2020	ratings	English	English	https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.49	Dingemanse2020	This list contains ratings of iconicity and humor, given both by human participants and as computational ratings. We included only the computational ratings and the iconicity ratings from [Perry et al. (2018)](:bib:Perry2018) since the humor ratings from [Engelthaler and Hills (2018)](:bib:Engelthaler2018) were added as separate dataset. The human ratings were compared to the ratings given by the computational model developed for the present study, which was trained on large natural language corpora. The study also includes ratings of aversion and taboos, which were not included here.