-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mkosi: fix Fedora GPG key issue in mkosi build #2303
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
mkosi: fix Fedora GPG key issue in mkosi build #2303
Conversation
@mkulke @stevenhorsman The mkosi job seems to be flaky. I encountered a GPG failure in #2290 and also noticed it in #2297 and #2302. This is an attempt to fix it. |
@beraldoleal latest two nightly CI for libvirt failed due that problem too. |
0e70055
to
c24c36b
Compare
Yes, but it seems the keys are already installed, so this PR will not fix. It looks like only a few rpm keys are missing. |
971a672
to
cfcca34
Compare
thanks for addressing this, not sure about the gpg-keys, but we will also have to set |
0792b6f
to
37c4ca7
Compare
Fedora 30 is EOL. Attempt to bump to F40. Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
This should have required fixes for handling fedora 40. Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
37c4ca7
to
1983861
Compare
@beraldoleal - are you able to bump the kata-agent, or do you want me to make the commit to this branch as it would be great to have the CI back in action. Thanks! |
This way we are going to be able to use newer fedora images. Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
Hi @stevenhorsman , based previous bumps I just assumed this should be done via cached-artefacts registry. See my recent commit. Let me know if there is something else to do. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, assuming the tests are back passing. Thanks @beraldoleal!
@mkulke the error now is a little bit different with mkosi test. Expected? Have you seen this before? |
It looks like the s390x podvm-mkosi is still using f39?:
do we need |
Lets see if this fixes the s390x issue. Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
Attempt to bump to F40. Since F39 is EOL since 2024-11-26. Which will conflict with 165e989