Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

benchmark failing because of lack of flag #888

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

benchmark failing because of lack of flag #888

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

ericcurtin
Copy link
Collaborator

@ericcurtin ericcurtin commented Feb 26, 2025

Specifically priviledged because it's not present in the args object.

Summary by Sourcery

Fixes a bug where the bench command was missing some arguments. This change introduces a new function bench_run_serve_perplexity_args to define arguments shared between bench, run and serve commands. The ngl argument was removed from the bench command and is now loaded from the model.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a new function bench_run_serve_perplexity_args to consolidate shared arguments between the bench, run, serve, and perplexity commands. It refactors the bench_parser and run_serve_perplexity_args functions to use the new function, removing duplicate argument definitions.

Updated class diagram for CLI argument parsing

classDiagram
    class bench_parser{
        +MODEL
        +func
    }
    class run_serve_perplexity_args{
        +ctx_size
    }
    class bench_run_serve_perplexity_args{
        +authfile
        +device
    }
    bench_parser -- bench_run_serve_perplexity_args : uses
    run_serve_perplexity_args -- bench_run_serve_perplexity_args : uses
    note for bench_parser "Arguments for benchmarking"
    note for run_serve_perplexity_args "Arguments for running, serving, and perplexity"
    note for bench_run_serve_perplexity_args "Shared arguments"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduces a new function bench_run_serve_perplexity_args to consolidate arguments shared between bench, run, serve, and perplexity commands.
  • Created bench_run_serve_perplexity_args function.
  • Moved --authfile argument definition to bench_run_serve_perplexity_args.
  • Moved --device argument definition to bench_run_serve_perplexity_args.
  • Moved --ctx-size argument definition to bench_run_serve_perplexity_args.
ramalama/cli.py
Refactors the bench_parser and run_serve_perplexity_args functions to use the new bench_run_serve_perplexity_args function.
  • Called bench_run_serve_perplexity_args in bench_parser.
  • Removed duplicate --ngl argument definition from bench_parser.
  • Called bench_run_serve_perplexity_args in run_serve_perplexity_args.
ramalama/cli.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ericcurtin - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider renaming bench_run_serve_perplexity_args to something more descriptive, as it's now used in multiple contexts.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 26, 2025

Can you add a test to run bench without checking for output, to at least catch crashes.

Specifically priviledged because it's not present in the args
object.

Signed-off-by: Eric Curtin <ecurtin@redhat.com>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 27, 2025

LGTM

@rhatdan rhatdan merged commit 70cfebf into main Feb 27, 2025
17 checks passed
@ericcurtin ericcurtin deleted the fix-bench branch February 27, 2025 09:51
utherp0 pushed a commit to utherp0/ramalama that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
benchmark failing because of lack of flag

Signed-off-by: utherp0 <ian.lawson@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants