Skip to content

Rework u256 #888

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
mborland opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Rework u256 #888

mborland opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mborland
Labels
enhancement New feature or request optimization

Comments

@mborland
Copy link
Member

This can be less comprehensive since we only need a few operations from the type, but can use the ADX instructions and others to speed up a few of the operations?
@mborland mborland added enhancement New feature or request optimization labels Mar 13, 2025
@mborland mborland self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
@mborland
Copy link
Member Author

AVX2 seems like the way to go for some instructions since we can jam the std::uint64_t vals[4]; into __m256i and perform operations that way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mborland mborland

Labels
enhancement New feature or request optimization
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mborland