You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
isn´t coverage more a subject information?
If it is suitable for formal information, why not dct:spatial?
But I don´t think coverage or refinement is appropriate here.
DC-Lib-AP-Def.: "The value of this element may also be included in Subject if desired".
So I think, It should be used interchangeable with "subject" and not for a formal information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
https://github.com/dcmi/schema.org/blob/master/mappings_schema.org.xml#L81
isn´t coverage more a subject information?
If it is suitable for formal information, why not dct:spatial?
But I don´t think coverage or refinement is appropriate here.
DC-Lib-AP-Def.: "The value of this element may also be included in Subject if desired".
So I think, It should be used interchangeable with "subject" and not for a formal information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: