Consistently use unsigned/size_t in big-int [blocks: #2310] #2452
92.91% of diff hit (target 78.71%)
View this Pull Request on Codecov
92.91% of diff hit (target 78.71%)
Annotations
Check warning on line 598 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L598
Added line #L598 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 612 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L612
Added line #L612 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 614 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L614
Added line #L614 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 628 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L628
Added line #L628 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 637 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L637
Added line #L637 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 648 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L648
Added line #L648 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 1071 in src/big-int/bigint.cc
codecov / codecov/patch
src/big-int/bigint.cc#L1071
Added line #L1071 was not covered by tests