Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(coderabbit.yaml): update coderabbit tone instructions #20

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

domabyte
Copy link
Owner

@domabyte domabyte commented Feb 20, 2025

Include software architecture focus and design patterns for better guidance in code reviews.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Streamlined internal quality guidelines to support improved maintainability and robustness.
    • Removed redundant elements for clearer review procedures.
  • Style
    • Updated formatting standards to promote consistent presentation and adherence to best practices.

…architecture focus and design patterns for better guidance in code reviews
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Warning

.coderabbit.yaml has a parsing error

The CodeRabbit configuration file in this repository has a parsing error and default settings were used instead. Please fix the error(s) in the configuration file. You can initialize chat with CodeRabbit to get help with the configuration file.

💥 Parsing errors (1)
Validation error: String must contain at most 250 character(s) at "tone_instructions"; Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'version', 'style'
⚙️ Configuration instructions
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@domabyte has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41f5c76 and 7f5cb92.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The configuration file .coderabbit.yaml has been modified. The tone_instructions field has been expanded with a more detailed description emphasizing expertise in software architecture, design patterns, and best practices. In the reviews section, the poem field has been removed and the section reorganized—resulting in a redundant high_level_summary field. Additional code quality checks have been introduced, while the style section continues to enforce Python formatting rules with the "ruff" formatter and a maximum line length of 88 characters.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Expanded tone_instructions with detailed role, design pattern, and best practice guidelines; removed poem field from reviews; reorganized the reviews section (resulting in duplicate high_level_summary); maintained style rules via ruff (max line length 88, excludes tests/docs).

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I'm a nimble rabbit in the code field bright,
Adjusting configs by day and night.
Nibbling patterns with a curious eye,
Hopping through settings as bugs pass by.
CodeRabbit leaps with a joyful sigh! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

7-7: Nitpick: Remove Trailing Whitespace

There is trailing whitespace on line 7. Removing it will ensure cleaner formatting and adherence to linting standards.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 7-7: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c27d305 and 41f5c76.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.coderabbit.yaml

[error] 7-7: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.coderabbit.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines 6 to 7
tone_instructions: 'You are an expert code reviewer and software architect specializing in Python. You work in an enterprise software development team, providing concise and clear code review advice with a focus on design patterns and best practices. Your reviews emphasize scalability, maintainability, and adherence to SOLID principles. You offer brief suggestions for implementing appropriate design patterns when relevant. You only elaborate or provide detailed explanations when explicitly requested. For personal projects, you maintain a balance between enterprise standards and practical solutions suitable for smaller-scale applications.'

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Tone Instructions Exceed Maximum Length or Schema Mismatch

The current text for tone_instructions exceeds the maximum allowed length of 250 characters as defined in the schema. Please either shorten the instruction text to fit within 250 characters or update the schema to allow a longer string if the detailed instructions are required.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 7-7: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.coderabbit.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines 9 to 13
profile: chill
high_level_summary: true
poem: false
review_status: true
high_level_summary: true
high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Duplicate Key in Reviews Section

The key high_level_summary is defined twice (lines 10 and 12) in the reviews block, which causes a YAML parsing error ("duplicated mapping key"). Please remove one of the duplicate entries to fix the configuration error.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 12-12: duplication of key "high_level_summary" in mapping

(key-duplicates)

@domabyte domabyte merged commit 5a654ea into master Feb 20, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant