Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add faux gem license headers #27

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

navarone-feekery
Copy link
Collaborator

It was decided on Slack that for the vendored Faux gem we should keep the original MIT license.
This PR adds that license as a header to all Faux gem files.

@navarone-feekery navarone-feekery requested a review from a team May 23, 2024 14:37
@navarone-feekery navarone-feekery changed the title Navarone/add faux gem license headers Add faux gem license headers May 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@artem-shelkovnikov artem-shelkovnikov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should there also be a license vendored here? (asking cause I have no idea about vendoring)

@navarone-feekery
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@artem-shelkovnikov there's already an MIT license file here: https://github.com/elastic/crawler/blob/main/vendor/faux/LICENSE

And the gemspec had MIT in its license field: https://github.com/elastic/crawler/blob/main/vendor/faux/faux.gemspec

Is this what you mean, or do you mean something else?

@artem-shelkovnikov
Copy link
Member

Ah sorry my bad, I thought that these files are added in this PR, but they were added a while ago along with the LICENSE file. Haven't woken up yet 😅

@navarone-feekery navarone-feekery merged commit 9bfd29f into main May 24, 2024
1 check passed
@navarone-feekery navarone-feekery deleted the navarone/add-faux-gem-license-headers branch May 24, 2024 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants