Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solution] Allow users to edit concurrent_searches and items_per_search for custom rules #183462

Conversation

dplumlee
Copy link
Contributor

@dplumlee dplumlee commented May 15, 2024

Summary

WIP

Addresses #178280

Adds components to the create and edit rule forms to allow users to edit concurrent_searches and items_per_search fields for indicator match rules

Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

For maintainers

@dplumlee dplumlee added release_note:enhancement Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. Team:Detection Rule Management Security Detection Rule Management Team Feature:Rule Creation Security Solution Detection Rule Creation workflow Feature:Rule Edit Security Solution Detection Rule Editing workflow v8.15.0 labels May 15, 2024
@dplumlee dplumlee self-assigned this May 15, 2024
@dplumlee
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR no longer needed

@dplumlee dplumlee closed this May 20, 2024
@dplumlee dplumlee deleted the concurrent-searches-items-per-search-field-components branch May 20, 2024 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Rule Creation Security Solution Detection Rule Creation workflow Feature:Rule Edit Security Solution Detection Rule Editing workflow release_note:enhancement Team:Detection Rule Management Security Detection Rule Management Team Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.15.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant