-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow programmatic control of observation #397
Merged
elwayman02
merged 2 commits into
elwayman02:master
from
chriskrycho:programmatic-observation
Jun 28, 2021
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
Allow programmatic control of observation
Add a named new argument, `isObserving`, with a default value of `true`, which users can pass to explicitly opt into or out of observing an element at a given time. This allows for a declarative invocation of the modifier itself based on tracked state, rather than having to handle it in the callback(s) passed to the modifier. Users can work around this today by only passing the `onEnter` or `onExit` callbacks conditionally: <div {{did-intersect onEnter=(if this.shouldDoSomething this.doSomething no-op) onExist=(if this.shouldDoSomething this.doSomethingElse no-op) }} > However, as this example shows, this is repetive (and potentially error- prone). The new functionality allows a less error-prone, less repetitive, more expressive approach: <div {{did-intersect isObserving=this.shouldDoSomething onEnter=this.doSomething onExit=this.doSomethingElse }} > Resolves #396
- Loading branch information
commit a70d1cd4ed2efb1acabc868d7aba77d53ad7d212
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Prefer not to use
assert.expect
for tests where the assertions are always called synchronously rather than in callbacks. This makes the tests brittle to change without adding a lot of value, in my experience.(Yes, I know a few of those snuck through above. I missed them in previous reviews :( )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can fix this in another PR, since it needs to be updated everywhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filed #398
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heh, I am 100% in agreement; I added it solely to match the existing tests I saw. 😅