Skip to content

Commit 105befd

Browse files
committed
Add onother alternative, continuing with #1068
1 parent 6bcef66 commit 105befd

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-18
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-18
lines changed

text/1079-ember-reactive.md

+3-18
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -473,21 +473,6 @@ on the impact of the API churn on existing apps, etc.
473473

474474
## Alternatives
475475

476-
Don't do `deep`
477-
<!--
478-
479-
> What other designs have been considered? What is the impact of not doing this?
480-
481-
> This section could also include prior art, that is, how other frameworks in the same domain have solved this problem.
482-
483-
-->
484-
485-
## Unresolved questions
486-
487-
<!--
488-
489-
490-
> Optional, but suggested for first drafts. What parts of the design are still
491-
TBD?
492-
493-
-->
476+
1. Don't do `deep`
477+
- without `deep`, wrapping a pojo could be a troll
478+
1. Proceed with [tracked-built-ins, built-in](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/1068)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)