style(codeSamples): remove top margin #179
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@enzonotario has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant OperationContent as OAOperationContent
participant Playground as OAPlayground
participant Parameters as OAPlaygroundParameters
participant Response as OAPlaygroundResponse
OperationContent->>Playground: Render try-it slot with props
Playground->>Parameters: Render parameters UI
Playground->>Response: Render response UI
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as Request Builder Caller
participant buildRequest as buildRequest()
participant getAuthHeaders as getAuthorizationsHeaders()
Caller->>buildRequest: Call buildRequest(authorizations, ...)
buildRequest->>getAuthHeaders: Process authorization schemes
getAuthHeaders-->>buildRequest: Return updated Headers
buildRequest-->>Caller: Return complete request object
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
src/components/Feature/OAOperationContent.vue(2 hunks)src/components/Playground/OAPlayground.vue(1 hunks)src/components/Playground/OAPlaygroundParameters.vue(4 hunks)src/components/Sample/OACodeSamples.vue(1 hunks)src/components/index.ts(0 hunks)src/lib/codeSamples/buildRequest.ts(3 hunks)src/lib/processOpenAPI/getCodeSamples.ts(1 hunks)src/types.ts(1 hunks)test/lib/buildRequest.test.ts(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/lib/codeSamples/buildRequest.ts
[error] 51-51: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/lib/processOpenAPI/getCodeSamples.ts (1)
33-34: LGTM! Consistent type handling.The explicit string conversion ensures consistent type handling for name and label properties.
src/types.ts (1)
62-62: LGTM! Type enhancement.The type change to include string as a possible value type provides more flexibility while maintaining type safety.
src/lib/codeSamples/buildRequest.ts (1)
47-79: LGTM! Well-structured authorization header handling.The extraction of authorization header logic into a separate function improves code organization and maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 51-51: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
test/lib/buildRequest.test.ts (2)
34-34: LGTM! Test cases updated correctly.The test cases have been properly updated to reflect the property rename from 'playgroundValue' to 'value'.
Also applies to: 118-118, 131-131, 145-146
1-1: PR description doesn't match the changes.The PR is described as "style(codeSamples): remove top margin" but contains significant functional changes to authorization handling. Please update the PR description to accurately reflect the changes being made.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/components/Feature/OAOperationContent.vue (1)
6-6: LGTM! Clean replacement of OATryWithVariables with OAPlayground.The migration maintains all necessary props and SSR compatibility.
Also applies to: 282-294
src/components/Playground/OAPlaygroundParameters.vue (1)
82-82: LGTM! Improved authorization handling.The changes enhance type safety and maintain consistency in property naming:
- Authorization is now always an array
- More explicit length check for rendering
- Consistent use of
valuepropertyAlso applies to: 90-90, 100-102, 131-131, 171-171
src/components/Sample/OACodeSamples.vue (1)
58-58: LGTM! Margin adjustment aligns with PR objective.Successfully removes top margin from code samples.
src/components/Playground/OAPlayground.vue (1)
5-6: LGTM! Improved import paths.Import paths now correctly use relative paths for components in the same directory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
e2e/one-page.spec.ts-snapshots/one-page-1-chromium-linux.pngis excluded by!**/*.pnge2e/one-page.spec.ts-snapshots/one-page-1-firefox-linux.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
docs/composables/useTheme.md(3 hunks)src/components/Request/OARequestBody.vue(2 hunks)src/components/Response/OAResponse.vue(3 hunks)src/components/Schema/OASchemaTabs.vue(3 hunks)src/composables/useTheme.ts(8 hunks)test/composables/useTheme.test.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/components/Request/OARequestBody.vue (1)
2-3: LGTM! Clean implementation of theme-based default view.The changes effectively integrate the theme configuration for request body default view, following Vue.js best practices.
Also applies to: 18-19, 27-27
src/components/Response/OAResponse.vue (1)
31-32: LGTM! Clean implementation of theme-based default view.The changes effectively integrate the theme configuration for response body default view.
Also applies to: 82-82
src/components/Schema/OASchemaTabs.vue (1)
17-20: LGTM! Well-structured prop definition and improved variable naming.The changes enhance the component with:
- Clear prop definition for defaultView
- More descriptive variable naming (schemaViewerDeep)
- Proper prop usage in computed values
Also applies to: 23-23, 37-37, 68-68
test/composables/useTheme.test.ts (1)
67-67: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for request body default view.The tests effectively validate:
- Default value retrieval
- Value setting and getting
- Integration with existing schema view functionality
Also applies to: 186-186, 190-190, 194-194
src/composables/useTheme.ts (3)
44-50: LGTM! Well-structured interface extension.The addition of the
bodyproperty withdefaultViewfollows the existing pattern and maintains type consistency with the request body configuration.
215-217: LGTM! Consistent configuration initialization.The response body configuration is properly initialized with the same default value as the request body configuration.
514-521: LGTM! Well-implemented getter and setter functions.The functions maintain type safety and follow the established pattern consistently.
docs/composables/useTheme.md (3)
45-48: LGTM! Clear and well-documented configuration example.The example clearly demonstrates how to configure the response body default view with helpful comments.
126-130: LGTM! Well-structured documentation section.The Request Body Configuration section follows the established documentation pattern and provides accurate information.
152-156: LGTM! Clear and consistent documentation update.The Response Configuration section is properly updated with the new function while maintaining consistency in format and alignment.
enzonotario
force-pushed
the
feature/playground
branch
from
ee4929c to
821ebd0
Compare
…ltView` by `getRequestBodyDefaultView` and `setRequestBodyDefaultView`
enzonotario
force-pushed
the
feature/playground
branch
from
821ebd0 to
329f0db
Compare
Description
Some refactors.
Related issues/external references
Types of changes