Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize nominative reporters regex group names #212

Open
grossir opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #214
Open

Standardize nominative reporters regex group names #212

grossir opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #214
Assignees

Comments

@grossir
Copy link
Contributor

grossir commented Mar 6, 2025

The citations from these reporters may not have a volume, which may make them overlap with full case citations. For example: "Ellenburg v. Chase, 2004 MT 66", where a candidate nominative reporter citation is "Chase 2004", while "2004 MT 66" is the correct but overlapped full citation.

By standardizing their named groups, we may handle the error above easily; as well as store them as citations when they do happen. Currently, the Courtlistener Citation and UnmatchedCitation models do not accept null volumes, so correct nominative citations like "In the case of The Indiana, Crabbe, 479, repairs were furnished in Philadelphia..." will me marked as errors

Check parent and sibling issues for more examples and use cases

@flooie flooie moved this to Buffer Zone in Case Law Sprint Mar 10, 2025
@flooie flooie moved this from Buffer Zone to March 10 to March 21 in Case Law Sprint Mar 10, 2025
@flooie flooie moved this from March 10 to March 21 to March 24 to April 4th in Case Law Sprint Mar 24, 2025
@flooie flooie moved this from March 24 to April 4th to To Do in Case Law Sprint Mar 24, 2025
@flooie flooie moved this from To Do to March 24 to April 4th in Case Law Sprint Mar 24, 2025
@quevon24 quevon24 linked a pull request Mar 27, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: March 24 to April 4th
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants