Skip to content

fix(backup): Also filter UserOption by key #69027

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

azaslavsky
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes the fix at #68943.

@azaslavsky azaslavsky marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 19:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Apr 16, 2024
@azaslavsky azaslavsky enabled auto-merge (squash) April 16, 2024 19:22
@azaslavsky azaslavsky merged commit d8f7510 into master Apr 16, 2024
47 checks passed
@azaslavsky azaslavsky deleted the azaslavsky/fix-user-option branch April 16, 2024 19:51
azaslavsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
The fixes in #68943 and
#69027 worked, but now fail on
comparison. This PR makes comparison clever enough to detect these
"duplicate" UserOption entries and avoid them.

This is a temporary fix. A more robust solution will prevent ever
exporting such UserOptions, but that will take a while to percolate
through the support window, so this should hold us over for the time
being.
azaslavsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
The fixes in #68943 and
#69027 worked, but now fail on
comparison. This PR makes comparison clever enough to detect these
"duplicate" UserOption entries and avoid them.

This is a temporary fix. A more robust solution will prevent ever
exporting such UserOptions, but that will take a while to percolate
through the support window, so this should hold us over for the time
being.
azaslavsky added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
The fixes in #68943 and
#69027 worked, but now fail on
comparison. This PR makes comparison clever enough to detect these
"duplicate" UserOption entries and avoid them.

This is a temporary fix. A more robust solution will prevent ever
exporting such UserOptions, but that will take a while to percolate
through the support window, so this should hold us over for the time
being.
MichaelSun48 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
The fixes in #68943 and
#69027 worked, but now fail on
comparison. This PR makes comparison clever enough to detect these
"duplicate" UserOption entries and avoid them.

This is a temporary fix. A more robust solution will prevent ever
exporting such UserOptions, but that will take a while to percolate
through the support window, so this should hold us over for the time
being.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants