-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
chore(aci): manually add spans for delayed workflow processing #91908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
generally lgtm 🎉
project = fetch_project(project_id) | ||
if not project: | ||
return | ||
|
||
workflow_event_dcg_data = fetch_group_to_event_data(project_id, Workflow, batch_key) | ||
workflow_event_dcg_data = fetch_group_to_event_data(project_id, Workflow, batch_key) | ||
|
||
# Get mappings from DataConditionGroups to other info | ||
dcg_to_groups, trigger_group_to_dcg_model = get_dcg_group_workflow_detector_data( | ||
workflow_event_dcg_data | ||
) | ||
dcg_to_workflow = trigger_group_to_dcg_model[DataConditionHandler.Group.WORKFLOW_TRIGGER].copy() | ||
dcg_to_workflow.update(trigger_group_to_dcg_model[DataConditionHandler.Group.ACTION_FILTER]) | ||
# Get mappings from DataConditionGroups to other info | ||
dcg_to_groups, trigger_group_to_dcg_model = get_dcg_group_workflow_detector_data( | ||
workflow_event_dcg_data | ||
) | ||
dcg_to_workflow = trigger_group_to_dcg_model[ | ||
DataConditionHandler.Group.WORKFLOW_TRIGGER | ||
].copy() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: should this be moved into a method to make it a little easier to read? perhaps naming it prepare_data
? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm yeah i can
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
err well there's the early return if there's no project
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the return type starts looking a little crazy if i put it all into a single function, so just going to keep it separate for now
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
|
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
...try/workflow_engine/processors/delayed_workflow.py | 4.16% | 23 Missing |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #91908 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.63% 87.62% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 10356 10356
Lines 587133 587141 +8
Branches 22585 22585
==========================================
+ Hits 514506 514510 +4
- Misses 72199 72203 +4
Partials 428 428
* master: (58 commits) link: cleanup link (#91687) ref: create project_id index for organizationonboardingtask (#91918) storybook: smaller last edited (#91875) issues: fix chonk stacktrace alignment (#91891) alert: drop custom alert (#91892) insights: fix bar height (#91895) ref(span-buffer): Move max-memory-percentage to right CLI (#91924) ref(js): Factor button functionality (#91763) tests(resolve_groups): Clean up the tests (#91779) ref(span-buffer): Add backpressure (#91707) fix(nextjs-insights): project id is not passed to explore link (#91920) fix(crons): Floor seconds / microsecond on recorded dateClock (#91890) fix(uptime): Fix bug with the uptime_checks dataset in the events endpoint (#91824) ref: add state-only migration to reflect existing indexes in prod (#91901) ref: remove unnecssary metaclass (#91906) fix(stats): use data category title name (#91913) feat(issues): Add success messages to some actions (#91899) test(taskworker): Lower exec time (#91907) chore(aci): manually add spans for delayed workflow processing (#91908) chore(aci): remove uses of WorkflowFireHistory rollout columns (#91904) ...
Suspect IssuesThis pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:
Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎 |
Like for delayed rule processing #91764, we should track the performance of delayed workflow processing. We need to manually add spans though.