Skip to content

feat(generator/rust): methods w/o HTTP annotations #1818

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

coryan
Copy link
Collaborator

@coryan coryan commented Apr 16, 2025

When targeting services that are gRPC-only, we need to generate all
methods, including those that lack HTTP annotations.

Part of the work for #1813

When targeting services that are gRPC-only, we need to generate all
methods, including those that lack HTTP annotations.
@coryan coryan marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 15:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.09%. Comparing base (11451d8) to head (8e12115).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1818   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.09%   96.09%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        1998     1998           
=======================================
  Hits         1920     1920           
  Misses         78       78           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@coryan coryan requested review from codyoss and dbolduc April 16, 2025 15:56
@coryan coryan merged commit 8a2c164 into googleapis:main Apr 16, 2025
21 checks passed
@coryan coryan deleted the feat-generator-rust-generate-gRPC-methods-without-http-annotations branch April 16, 2025 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants