-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Leave Request Cancellation Policy #548
Comments
Hi @bokanoo , In Horilla, the leave cancellation workflow allows employees to request the cancellation of their leave requests under certain conditions:
If you need any further adjustments or settings regarding this workflow, please let us know. Best Regards, |
Hi Team, Thank you for the update, I will check with the workflow and get back to you. Best, |
|
Hi @bokanoo, Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We will prioritize resolving these issues in the upcoming updates. If you need any further clarification or assistance, please let us know. Happy to have you as part of the Horilla community! Best Regards, |
I’m glad to be part of the Horilla community and appreciate the platform’s features. One thing to add...I would like to suggest an enhancement regarding leave applications for past dates. In many HR systems, employees are allowed to apply for leave for past days, which can be useful in situations where they were unable to submit the request on time due to unforeseen circumstances. Currently, Horilla does not provide the option to apply for leave for past dates. It would be highly beneficial to introduce this feature, allowing employees to submit leave requests for days that have already passed. This flexibility would better accommodate real world scenarios and improve the overall user experience. |
Hi @bokanoo , Thank you for your valuable feedback and for being part of the Horilla community! Horilla already provides an option to allow leave applications for past dates. You can enable this by navigating to: By default, this restriction is enabled, preventing employees from submitting leave requests for past dates. However, once disabled, employees will be able to apply for leave for days that have already passed, accommodating real-world scenarios where they were unable to submit requests on time. Let us know if you need any further assistance! Best Regards, |
Hi @bokanoo , Start and End Date Breakdown Issue (Resolved)
Regarding others, cloud you please share a video demonstration of the leave balance refund functionality. Looking forward for your response Best Regards, |
Hi Team, Thank you for all the updates and information provided. Regarding the leave balance refund, in the demo video request, are you referring to showcasing the issue or the specific scenario I mentioned earlier? Kindly clarify so I can provide further details if needed. |
And I checked with this one, "The issue where the "start and end date breakdown" changed incorrectly after saving has been successfully fixed. The system now correctly retains the selected values." But still the error is happening with the fresh source code that I have updated today. Please check with your end. |
Hi @bokanoo , Please try by pull the latest code . We added the updations to resolve the issue . Also regarding others, cloud you please share a video demonstration of the leave balance refund functionality. Best Regards, |
Hi Team, The issue with the start and end date breakdown has been resolved. Regarding the other scenario, since I’m unable to create a demo video, I’ve attached a PDF below. It includes screenshots with brief descriptions to illustrate the workflow scenario. I hope this file helps clarify the situation and provides the necessary context for further review. |
In the leave approval workflow, it appears that an employee can cancel a leave request even after it has been approved by the line manager. Typically, the request cannot be canceled while it is in an approved status; cancellation is usually only permitted when the status is pending. Is there an option or setting to adjust this? Please advise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: