Added Volumetric Weight Calculation to Improve Shipping Cost Accuracy #3651
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ctual vs. volumetric weight and charges based on the higher one.
|
Congratulations! You have completed the lab. Closing for maintainence purpose. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I’ve added a feature that incorporates volumetric weight into the shippping cost calculation. The system now charges based on the higher value between actual and volumetric weight (calculated using the industry-standard formula: length × width × height ÷ 5000). This ensures more precise shipping costs for bulky but light packeges.
This will close the issue:
I’d love to contribute to this project as I believe this improvement will enhance cost accuracy for users. Let me know if you’d like any further adjustments!