Address review comments from PyOpenSci

[MicahGale]

Pull Request Checklist for MontePy

Description

This is the first PR for incorporating @munkm's comment as part of the PyOpenSci review.

This addresses the comments around documentation. #649 addresses the comments about the JOSS article.

@munkm could you review this?

Fixes #646

---

General Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• The code follows the standards outlined in the development documentation.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable).

---

Documentation Checklist

• I have documented all added classes and methods.
• For infrastructure updates, I have updated the developer's guide.
• For significant new features, I have added a section to the getting started guide.

---

First-Time Contributor Checklist

• If this is your first contribution, add yourself to pyproject.toml if you wish to do so.

---

Additional Notes for Reviewers

Ensure that:

• The submitted code is consistent with the merge checklist outlined here.
• The PR covers all relevant aspects according to the development guidelines.
• 100% coverage of the patch is achieved, or justification for a variance is given.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://montepy--647.org.readthedocs.build/en/647/

[tjlaboss]

Why does this trigger black? __init__.py isn't touched.

https://github.com/idaholab/MontePy/actions/runs/13032799103/job/36355785572?pr=647#step:5:12

[MicahGale]

It does for black 25.1 apparently. Maybe we need to start pinning black.