Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dependency policy according to selected package manager #68

Open
PeterDaveHello opened this issue Dec 15, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Dependency policy according to selected package manager #68

PeterDaveHello opened this issue Dec 15, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Contributor

aptitude & apt-get uses different policies to decide the dependencies, apt-fast uses apt-get's to decide, if we let apt-fast to use aptitude, it may miss some files or download useless files.
@chrstphrchvz chrstphrchvz mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2016
Closed
@chrstphrchvz
Copy link
Contributor

The same happens with apt: apt upgrade will install new packages, whereas apt-get upgrade will not. However, apt can list the needed uris for apt-fast.

@Lasall Lasall changed the title [bug] Asymmetric behavier Asymmetric behavior Oct 30, 2017
@Lasall Lasall changed the title Asymmetric behavior Dependency policy according to selected package manager Nov 20, 2017
@chrstphrchvz chrstphrchvz mentioned this issue Jan 11, 2018
Closed
Lasall added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2018
@Lasall
Don't run APTMGR with --download-only/-d. Closes #136
1cf1f13 
 * Except if aptitude is used, because of different problem resolving.
   Also see #68.
 * Fix download command: if aptitude is used, run it after apt-fast
   download because of different problem resolving.
Repository owner deleted a comment Dec 15, 2022
Repository owner locked as spam and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 15, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from gothicVI Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@PeterDaveHello @chrstphrchvz