From c96238c0571afa957ab6133fab47872ca2941dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mirjak Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:22:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] smaller edits to align --- draft-kuehlewind-iab-rfc4053bis.md | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-kuehlewind-iab-rfc4053bis.md b/draft-kuehlewind-iab-rfc4053bis.md index b18a494..fdc84a2 100644 --- a/draft-kuehlewind-iab-rfc4053bis.md +++ b/draft-kuehlewind-iab-rfc4053bis.md @@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ other organization. # Responding to Incoming Liaison Statements Any incoming liaison statement that indicates that it is for - "Comment" or for "Action" requires a response by the deadline. + "Action" requires a response by the deadline. It is the responsibility of the (co)chair(s) of - the addressed organization to ensure that a response is generated by + the addressed group to ensure that a response is generated by the deadline if a respone is intended. ## Responding to Requests for Information @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ other organization. It is important that appropriate leadership review be made of proposed IETF liaison statements and that those writing such -statements, who claim to be speaking on behalf of IETF, are truly +statements, who claim to be speaking on behalf of a group in the IETF, are truly representing IETF views. For a liaison statement generated on behalf of an IETF WG, the WG @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ the IAB Chair on the message. In cases where prior agreement was not obtained as outlined above, and the designated authority (AD, IETF Chair, or IAB Chair) in fact does not agree with the message, the designated authority will work -with the liaison manager to follow up as appropriate, including +with the liaison manager or IAB to follow up as appropriate, including emitting a revised liaison statement if necessary. Clearly, this is a situation best avoided by assuring appropriate agreement in advance of sending the liaison message. @@ -499,9 +499,7 @@ of sending the liaison message. have also used the liaison statement process to impose deadlines on IETF activities, which has been frustrating for all concerned - the IETF because it does not accept such deadlines, and other - organizations because they feel ignored. - - For this reason the submission process is automated. While the IETF + organizations because they feel ignored. While the IETF cannot rate-limit the submitters, it can manage its internal pipelines.