Skip to content

Build order AND Purchase Order #5482

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mabroens opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Build order AND Purchase Order #5482

mabroens opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
question This is a question

Comments

@mabroens
Copy link

Body of the issue

Hi team,

i need some guidence.

We use Inventree to keep track of stock for both parts and finisched products. this means all bom items that we deliver for manufacturing to our assemblyhouse are tracked using inventree and once the assembled PCBA's come back we close the order and add them including their serialnumbers (in our case MAC adresses) to the stock.

but what is the best way to do this. currently i create a Purchase order for 125 PCBA's and create a Build order for 125 pcs(to keep track of our parts count). once they come in i have now closed both order but now i our stock was not incremented by 125 but with 250 (125 for PO and 125 for BO) actually thats obvious but did not think about this :-(

image

Question how can i now best lower stock with 125 pcs. i guess i need to do a stock take on the first 4 rows. or is there a better way to get this resolved??

I know ther have been question on linking Build and purchase orders what is the status on this i guess that would have solved this issue??

Br Martijn

@mabroens mabroens added documentation triage:not-checked Item was not checked by the core team labels Aug 26, 2023
@matmair matmair added question This is a question and removed triage:not-checked Item was not checked by the core team documentation labels Aug 27, 2023
@matmair
Copy link
Contributor

matmair commented Aug 27, 2023

This sounds like an internal workflow/consultation problem, not a bug.

@SchrodingersGat
Copy link
Member

@mabroens it does sound like this issue would be functionally "solved" by #1071 - but not much progress on that as yet. There are some interesting ideas in that thread regarding how others have approached this "double handling" issue.

In terms of consolidating the stock you have on hand currently - you could simply perform a stocktake to reduce or remove the extra / duplicate stock items.

@mabroens
Copy link
Author

@SchrodingersGat yes agree. lets close this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question This is a question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants