Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
31 lines (18 loc) · 1.61 KB

Overall_Summary.md

File metadata and controls

31 lines (18 loc) · 1.61 KB

Original Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BMVF9WK

Overall Summary and Outcomes

Overall, folks are happy with IOT-directorate performance. There are some constructive comments/suggestions to think about. IoT-Directorates co-chairs and ADs have met and analysed the survey results together and as a result some action items have been identified. We also discussed the average frequency of reviews for IOT-directorate members. Please see the following the summary of observations and outcomes.

  • In general, for most of the respondents the charter is clear.
  • The IoT Directorate pre-ietf meetings are useful for the members.
  • 1-2 days are needed to accept/reject a review request once assigned
  • Each member of the IoT Directorate will require to do at least ONE review per quarter

Other observation/outcomes

  • The charter needs an update and should be in-line with what the group does.
  • Many express interests in helping out more than reviews; the expectations are that this group helps align IOT related activities within IETF.
  • Some commented that the reviews should be limited to IoT-related drafts
  • Some commented on pre-IETF timing issue (too early for West coast) -- Co-chairs moved the pre-IETF-111 meeting time a little later
  • Other suggestions:The pre-meeting could use the time for more discussion and making decisions etc.

Action Items:

  1. Co-chairs to launch periodic discussions with external SDOs - it will be arranged separately from pre-IETF calls
  2. ADs will experiment with relevant Last call drafts assignment for IOT-DIR review ( so that more time can be allocated for an review )