Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] dev from opf:dev #526

Merged
merged 72 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

[pull] dev from opf:dev #526

merged 72 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Apr 2, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

ulferts and others added 30 commits April 1, 2025 16:38
Co-authored-by: Ivan Kuchin <i.kuchin@openproject.com>
toy and others added 28 commits April 1, 2025 16:41
rename end_date/end_gate to finish_date/finish_gate
Bumps [nokogiri](https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri) from 1.18.6 to 1.18.7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](sparklemotion/nokogiri@v1.18.6...v1.18.7)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: nokogiri
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
on spec `./spec/features/users/index_spec.rb:72`
on job https://github.com/opf/openproject/actions/runs/14200641973/job/39786500702

     Failure/Error: expect(rows.map(&:text)).to include(*users.map(&:login))
       expected [] to include "bob1"
     # ./spec/support/pages/admin/users/index.rb:41:in 'Pages::Admin::Users::Index#expect_listed'
     # ./spec/features/users/index_spec.rb:115:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

I suppose the UI was not updated with the filtered content despite the
previous command `filter_by_status` having a `wait_for_network_idle` in
it.

By adding a `count` parameter to the `page.all` call, it will wait until
the count matches the expected count, which should fix the flakiness
seen.
…erty-of-phase

Rework life cycle data structure
The endpoint filtered against, /api/v3/principals, already has the visible scope attached to it. Therefore, no non visible principals can be retrieved anyway. Handing in the ids from the client does not provide additional filtering.
…e-in-project-list-filters-in-instances-with-many-users

avoid long list of ids in filter
…18.7

Bump nokogiri from 1.18.6 to 1.18.7
…d to user custom field strategies to use the user autocompleter for user custom fields.
Fixes for Custom Actions administration
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Apr 2, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit 679eb0d into kp-forks:dev Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants