Skip to content

Refactor CAPZ codebase to reenabled kubebuilder #5391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
nawazkh opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Refactor CAPZ codebase to reenabled kubebuilder #5391

nawazkh opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.

Comments

@nawazkh
Copy link
Member

nawazkh commented Jan 27, 2025

/kind cleanup

What needs cleanup:
[A clear and concise description of what needs to be cleaned up.]

  • Refactor CAPZ code to reenable kubebuilder.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Following the mini experiment at Update PROJECT file #5390 (comment), we should probe to restore kubebuilder <command> functionality in CAPZ.
  • If not restore, document the reason for moving away from Kubebuilder.
  • If not moved away, we should try refactoring CAPZ code to leverage kubebuilder. I was not able to generate a new API in CAPZ (kubebuilder create api) without manual refactoring of CAPZ code.

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Jan 27, 2025
@nawazkh nawazkh added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Jan 27, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 27, 2025
@nawazkh nawazkh added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants