-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 550
feat(conformance): validate implementation flags #3715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
/retest |
/lgtm |
/retest |
Signed-off-by: Mattia Lavacca <lavacca.mattia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mattia Lavacca <lavacca.mattia@gmail.com>
0f34cff
to
d6a4019
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mlavacca The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@youngnick I lost your lgtm as I needed to lint the code. Do you mind taking another look? |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/area conformance-machinery
What this PR does / why we need it:
The conformance suite implementation-related flags are properly validated.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2178
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: