Fixed some warnings

[yuvalsw]

TITLE

Fixed some warnings

Description

Description of the pull request changes and motivation.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

---

This change is 

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.179 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 26.404 s, System: 0.773 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.169 s … 27.189 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.156 s ±  0.028 s    [User: 26.422 s, System: 0.732 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.137 s … 27.176 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.976 s ±  0.022 s    [User: 26.414 s, System: 0.782 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.960 s … 14.992 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.947 s ±  0.002 s    [User: 26.351 s, System: 0.784 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.945 s … 14.948 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.300 s ±  0.039 s    [User: 38.815 s, System: 0.926 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.273 s … 11.327 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.096 s ±  0.255 s    [User: 38.908 s, System: 0.907 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.915 s … 11.276 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.02 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.837 s ±  0.238 s    [User: 39.361 s, System: 0.938 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.668 s … 11.005 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.857 s ±  0.068 s    [User: 39.442 s, System: 0.930 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.809 s … 10.905 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.704 s ±  0.159 s    [User: 40.044 s, System: 0.939 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.591 s … 10.817 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.822 s ±  0.033 s    [User: 39.821 s, System: 0.916 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.799 s … 10.845 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.763 s ±  0.172 s    [User: 40.046 s, System: 1.047 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.642 s … 10.885 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.541 s ±  0.058 s    [User: 40.091 s, System: 1.019 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.500 s … 10.582 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.189 ± 0.018	2.173	2.230	1.00
head big_factorial	2.190 ± 0.017	2.172	2.217	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.116 ± 0.018	2.100	2.146	1.00
head big_fibonacci	2.119 ± 0.016	2.099	2.141	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.866 ± 0.127	7.775	8.172	1.00 ± 0.02
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.857 ± 0.083	7.764	7.991	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.279 ± 0.033	2.237	2.329	1.01 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000	2.266 ± 0.020	2.229	2.292	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.494 ± 0.015	1.478	1.519	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.499 ± 0.007	1.488	1.512	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.262 ± 0.011	1.248	1.281	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.258 ± 0.014	1.245	1.293	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.915 ± 0.054	7.858	8.014	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.921 ± 0.068	7.822	8.030	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.135 ± 0.092	8.060	8.302	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.164 ± 0.084	8.073	8.285	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.248 ± 0.020	2.218	2.277	1.00
head linear_search	2.274 ± 0.037	2.236	2.335	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.584 ± 0.016	1.570	1.624	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.579 ± 0.016	1.565	1.616	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.526 ± 0.006	1.514	1.533	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.542 ± 0.026	1.518	1.607	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.266 ± 0.016	1.252	1.306	1.00 ± 0.02
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.265 ± 0.012	1.251	1.290	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.633 ± 0.007	1.622	1.642	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.645 ± 0.022	1.628	1.699	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	543.6 ± 2.5	540.5	549.3	1.00
head pedersen	545.1 ± 2.1	542.3	548.0	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	664.9 ± 9.0	650.5	673.6	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	669.0 ± 10.7	658.5	696.2	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.924 ± 0.022	1.903	1.970	1.01 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.910 ± 0.007	1.902	1.926	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	684.0 ± 4.2	678.8	689.5	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	687.4 ± 3.2	682.5	691.5	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.398 ± 0.032	4.348	4.435	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.436 ± 0.058	4.365	4.542	1.01 ± 0.01

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.46%. Comparing base (3de653d) to head (441cc4e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1980      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.46%   96.46%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         103      103              
  Lines       42512    42510       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        41010    41008       -2     
  Misses       1502     1502              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[OmriEshhar1]

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)

---

CHANGELOG.md line 9 at r1 (raw file):

#### [2.0.0] - 2025-02-26

- fix: Check overflow in cairo pie address calculation [#1945](https://github.com/lambdaclass/cairo-vm/pull/1945)

why all these changes in the CHANGELOG doc. is this intentional?

[OmriEshhar1]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)

[yuvalsw]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)

[yuvalsw]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)

---

CHANGELOG.md line 9 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, OmriEshhar1 wrote…

why all these changes in the CHANGELOG doc. is this intentional?

No, probably some auto format. Thanks.

[OmriEshhar1]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)

[OmriEshhar1]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, and @pefontana)