Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix Conditional visibility in sections #231

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix Conditional visibility in sections #231

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

atmonshi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@what-the-diff What The Diff
Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Jan 10, 2024

PR Summary

  • Improved Validation in HasOptions class
    The team added a new checks into the HasOptions class. This checks specifically whether dataSource within fields.options is provided, enhancing data reliability.

  • Default Items Support in Form Elements
    The team structured comments to automate the setting of default items for data sources in CheckboxList, Radio, and Select classes. This helps build a predictable, standardized set of options across these form classes.

@atmonshi atmonshi merged commit ac86ec8 into 2.x Jan 10, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@atmonshi atmonshi deleted the fix-conditional branch January 10, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@atmonshi