Skip to content

[feature]: testnet4 lacks DNS seeds #9658

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
gus4rs opened this issue Mar 30, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

[feature]: testnet4 lacks DNS seeds #9658

gus4rs opened this issue Mar 30, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@gus4rs
Copy link

gus4rs commented Mar 30, 2025

Mar 30 21:00:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:00:46.353 [INF] DISC: Attempting to bootstrap with: Authenticated Channel Graph
Mar 30 21:00:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:00:46.354 [ERR] SRVR: Unable to retrieve initial bootstrap peers: no addresses found
Mar 30 21:01:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:01:46.355 [INF] DISC: Attempting to bootstrap with: Authenticated Channel Graph
Mar 30 21:01:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:01:46.357 [ERR] SRVR: Unable to retrieve initial bootstrap peers: no addresses found
Mar 30 21:02:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:02:46.358 [INF] DISC: Attempting to bootstrap with: Authenticated Channel Graph
Mar 30 21:02:46 localhost.localdomain lnd[379392]: 2025-03-30 21:02:46.359 [ERR] SRVR: Unable to retrieve initial bootstrap peers: no addresses found

Is testnet4 usable currently?

@gus4rs gus4rs added bug Unintended code behaviour needs triage labels Mar 30, 2025
@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator

guggero commented Mar 31, 2025

There is no automated bootstrapping infrastructure in place yet. But you should be able to connect to peers manually to sync the graph. Hopefully once the final non-RC version of lnd 0.19 gets out, the boostrap lseed instances are in place.

@twofaktor
Copy link
Contributor

twofaktor commented Mar 31, 2025

Be free to open a channel with me, I already have 2 active channels with other peers, fully functional (testnet4):

030f289f0f931cd33cc3435dc5f5fc2a6a65bb0297327d43e82562aded10df74a7@zscl5v323mngmeyu33wyrlkqyc3emaiv7pdezxjfrtu5qegedvmotpid.onion:9735

@Roasbeef Roasbeef changed the title No peers on testnet4 [feature]: testnet4 lacks DNS seeds Mar 31, 2025
@saubyk saubyk added dns testnet4 and removed bug Unintended code behaviour needs triage labels Apr 3, 2025
@Impa10r
Copy link

Impa10r commented Apr 3, 2025

@gus4rs you can also connect to my 24/7 node:

03a17ec2c693c82d7b8d6616dcaf57cbfb0df506045612e08c9580b0c55dda2c1d@72elnf2w7ahgqkwhqfh3pjrxdtwdszpl3bqhly6ipx6agz4sc6kwkfid.onion:9735

But as Roasbeef mentioned elsewhere, testnet4 is even more broken than testnet3. Been waiting for a channel open for 5 hours already, despite 40+ confs on mempool.space:

~ $ lncli pendingchannels
{
    "total_limbo_balance": "0",
    "pending_open_channels": [
        {
            "channel": {
                "remote_node_pub": "02b4a6fc4cd7e3fb9917571a96a4a075c70f7f4b8636eb022c23cca01ef863bde9",
                "channel_point": "652cb9849989ba2c9bf0e8f202b7fe939754a6d53b4b421c7ffda6aba1247653:1",
                "capacity": "1986150",
                "local_balance": "1982680",
                "remote_balance": "0",
                "local_chan_reserve_sat": "19861",
                "remote_chan_reserve_sat": "19861",
                "initiator": "INITIATOR_LOCAL",
                "commitment_type": "ANCHORS",
                "num_forwarding_packages": "0",
                "chan_status_flags": "",
                "private": false,
                "memo": "",
                "custom_channel_data": ""
            },
            "commit_fee": "2810",
            "commit_weight": "772",
            "fee_per_kw": "2500",
            "funding_expiry_blocks": 1974
        }
    ],
    "pending_closing_channels": [],
    "pending_force_closing_channels": [],
    "waiting_close_channels": []
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants