Skip to content

Support Object Storage Quota Limits Visibility #531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

yec-akamai
Copy link
Contributor

📝 Description

Add support to new endpoints for Object Storage Quota related features.

✔️ How to Test

make test-unit

@yec-akamai yec-akamai added the new-feature for new features in the changelog. label Apr 11, 2025
@yec-akamai yec-akamai requested a review from a team as a code owner April 11, 2025 20:08
@yec-akamai yec-akamai requested review from lgarber-akamai and ykim-akamai and removed request for a team April 11, 2025 20:08
Copy link
Contributor

@lgarber-akamai lgarber-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, nice work!

Copy link
Contributor

@ykim-akamai ykim-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice work! test pass locally

@yec-akamai yec-akamai merged commit 5342d35 into linode:proj/limits-visibility Apr 23, 2025
12 checks passed
@yec-akamai yec-akamai deleted the TPT-3586/limits-obj branch April 23, 2025 20:40
yec-akamai added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
* Support Object Storage Quota Limits Visibility (#531)

* obj quota

* add comment

* build json object

* add obj quotas int tests (#535)

* Update Object Storage quota doc link (#543)

---------

Co-authored-by: Youjung Kim <126618609+ykim-akamai@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-feature for new features in the changelog.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants