-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for opening this pull request! Be sure to follow the pull request template!
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: |
I am closing this pr because of the noninclusive nature of linuxserver community. |
Sorry need to close with comment. |
This had no chance to be merged, as it was filed incorrectly, which you would have known if you followed the PR template and read the https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-quassel-core/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md file. |
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Banned over reporting documentable
issues. Replies to troll me after banning.
…On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 2:31 AM Roxedus ***@***.***> wrote:
This had no chance to be merged, as it was filed incorrectly, which you
would have known if you followed the PR template and read the
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-quassel-core/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
file.
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#44 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKEIUFCNDYKRXCEQQAHXHI3SWB7S5ANCNFSM4UWL2G5A>
.
|
Im telling you the result of this PR would be the same readme as it currently, as our pipeline generates the readme based on the contents of the readme vars file. Your ban is due to the negative, bordering hostile attitude you also show now. |
No, it's because your community is not inclusive. I brought up the
legitimate issues respectfully and was banned by one of the other
moderators. It's unfortunate that the moderators of the discord do not
allow legitimate issues to be brought forward (regarding other containers),
but accusing me of being hostile is a bit much.
Please do not reply to this issue, I do not want to continue what you
describe as negativity or borderline hostility. I want to leave on a good
note, as I am never allowed to communicate in the discord community again
yes I brought up legitimate concerns with the next cloud container. That is
unrelated to this issue, this issue is closed.
…On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 3:33 AM Roxedus ***@***.***> wrote:
Im telling you the result of this PR would be the same readme as it
currently, as our pipeline generates the readme based on the contents of
the readme vars file.
Your ban is due to the negative, bordering hostile attitude you also show
now.
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#44 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKEIUFCEYTDIEXLJLEWSZ2TSWCGYDANCNFSM4UWL2G5A>
.
|
How to use posgresql