Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 30, 2022. It is now read-only.

Add types as dependencies. #201

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Add types as dependencies. #201

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ksaaskil
Copy link
Contributor

@ksaaskil ksaaskil commented Aug 30, 2019

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 30, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #201 into dev will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #201   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.81%   88.81%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        1529     1529           
  Branches      357      357           
=======================================
  Hits         1358     1358           
  Misses        171      171

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8d448ff...c4d39ae. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@idantene idantene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the late reply, didn't see this!
LGTM, although I was under the impression that type dependencies (whether dev or not) should be at the top-most lerna level?

@ksaaskil
Copy link
Contributor Author

ksaaskil commented Sep 9, 2019

But if they're in the lerna level, then individual packages do not include their own type dependencies I assume? Or they include the type dependencies of all packages? Neither of those sounds right to me 🤔

@idantene
Copy link
Contributor

idantene commented Sep 9, 2019

Fair points. Maybe it's just the dev dependencies then.

@mikesol
Copy link

mikesol commented Sep 24, 2019

Hey! Just wanted to see what the status of this is. Alive? Dead?

@ksaaskil
Copy link
Contributor Author

ksaaskil commented Sep 24, 2019

Waiting for the final approval and fixing looots of conflicts, probably easier to just start over as so many dependencies have come and gone... Why so, is this causing trouble?

@ksaaskil ksaaskil closed this Sep 27, 2019
@ksaaskil
Copy link
Contributor Author

So much has changed since this was implemented that it's easier to just start over.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants