Skip to content

Update to idl@3.64.2, bcd@6.0.20 #2039

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2024

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Thanks for the PR!

This section of the codebase is owned by @saschanaz - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged.

Copy link
Member

@jakebailey jakebailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious, why do this manually instead of merging the automated PR?

@Bashamega
Copy link
Contributor

Curious, why do this manually instead of merging the automated PR?

Mainly because we needed to update the input field, and they don't have permission to update the PR

@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Precisely.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 3d62c14 into microsoft:main Jun 4, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Merging because @saschanaz is a code-owner of all the changes - thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the pr-2024-2 branch June 4, 2025 15:58
@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

(I'd really like to automate the dictionary support status but such info is simply not available in a machine readable form 😕)

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

You mean inputfiles/removedTypes.jsonc, right? Just trying to understand, I'm easily nerd sniped 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants