Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HMAI-286 Make LinkedPrisoner and PrisonerContactRestrictions models consistent with new naming #727

Conversation

BushraAbdullahi
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@BushraAbdullahi BushraAbdullahi changed the title Make LinkedPrisoner and PrisonerContactRestrictions models consistent with new naming HMAI-286 Make LinkedPrisoner and PrisonerContactRestrictions models consistent with new naming Mar 7, 2025
@BushraAbdullahi BushraAbdullahi marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2025 11:20
Copy link
Contributor

@tomwatkins1994 tomwatkins1994 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PRLinkedPrisoner.kt file has been renamed but the classes within are still as before. Think you just need to go into the file and rename them manually

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just LinkedPrisonerRelationship left to do in this file pls

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is this doing differently to the PRPrisonerContactRestrictions?

@tomwatkins1994 tomwatkins1994 merged commit 265f394 into main Mar 11, 2025
11 checks passed
@tomwatkins1994 tomwatkins1994 deleted the HMAI-286-make-linked-prisoner-and-prisoner-contact-restrictions-models-consistent-with-new-naming branch March 11, 2025 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants