Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Improve 'Implementing Chain Signatures' doc #2381

Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #494
thisisjoshford opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2442
Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #494

[DOC] Improve 'Implementing Chain Signatures' doc #2381

thisisjoshford opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2442
Assignees

Comments

@thisisjoshford
Copy link
Collaborator

thisisjoshford commented Dec 18, 2024

Documentation Type

New Documentation

What needs documentation?

Improve the implementing chain signatures doc based on Prox feedback.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Verify and fix the examples (e.g., BTC snippet doesnt work due to the requirement of attached deposit)
  • I don’t think it’s “Reconstructing the Signature” so much as it’s “Formatting the Signature” from the response from MPC
  • Included feedback on this document feedback-edson

Resources & References

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IiQA4SadV4GAsHvz-Q-beGV849DzaPyXxAQoTWAjG0w/edit?tab=t.0

Priority

🟠 P1 : Important Documentation Gap

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to NEW❗ in DevRel Dec 18, 2024
@gagdiez gagdiez moved this from NEW❗ to In Progress 🏗️ in DevRel Jan 6, 2025
@bucanero bucanero linked a pull request Jan 24, 2025 that will close this issue
@gagdiez gagdiez moved this from In Progress 🏗️ to In Review 👀 in DevRel Feb 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review 👀 to Shipped 🚀 in DevRel Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants