Skip to content

Actions: near/near-sdk-rs

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
9 workflow run results
9 workflow run results

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

chore: release
Test Small Examples #2583: Pull request #1115 synchronize by frol
January 7, 2024 16:48 2m 24s release-plz-2023-11-28T21-35-14Z
January 7, 2024 16:48 2m 24s
chore: release
Test Core #2755: Pull request #1115 synchronize by frol
January 7, 2024 16:48 3m 5s release-plz-2023-11-28T21-35-14Z
January 7, 2024 16:48 3m 5s
chore: release
Test Examples #2590: Pull request #1115 synchronize by frol
January 7, 2024 16:48 2m 12s release-plz-2023-11-28T21-35-14Z
January 7, 2024 16:48 2m 12s
fix: include near-sdk/src/private/result_type_ext.rs file into modu…
Test Core #2754: Commit 8dd5d49 pushed by frol
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 23s master
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 23s
fix: include near-sdk/src/private/result_type_ext.rs file into modu…
Test Examples #2589: Commit 8dd5d49 pushed by frol
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 16s master
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 16s
fix: include near-sdk/src/private/result_type_ext.rs file into modu…
Test Small Examples #2582: Commit 8dd5d49 pushed by frol
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 36s master
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 36s
fix: include near-sdk/src/private/result_type_ext.rs file into modu…
Release-plz #30: Commit 8dd5d49 pushed by frol
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 49s master
January 7, 2024 16:45 2m 49s
parity-secp256k1 relies on a library that is no longer maintained. Should we switch to rust-secp256k1?
Compare contract sizes with master #117: Issue comment #1126 (comment) created by zwong91
January 6, 2024 02:01 2s
January 6, 2024 02:01 2s
parity-secp256k1 relies on a library that is no longer maintained. Should we switch to rust-secp256k1?
Compare contract sizes with master #116: Issue comment #1126 (comment) created by zwong91
January 6, 2024 02:00 2s
January 6, 2024 02:00 2s