forked from ava-labs/icm-contracts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
develop-acp99 #30
Open
zjesko
wants to merge
22
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
develop-acp99
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
develop-acp99 #30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
contracts/validator-manager/Native721TokenStakingManager.sol
Dismissed
Show dismissed
Hide dismissed
* initilialiser checks and events * add complete delegator removal if validator has ended * add tests for double delegation and stake and nft delegation by same delegator * fix tests and add nft event * add locked nfts to event
* add validator removal admin * nit: fix extra space
3f489d9
to
1c3128c
Compare
1c3128c
to
bc5710f
Compare
Comment on lines
+716
to
+731
function _calculateEffectiveWeight( | ||
uint256 weight, | ||
uint64 currentUptime, | ||
uint64 previousUptime | ||
) internal view returns (uint256) { | ||
if(previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0) { | ||
return 0; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Return full weight if uptime is above threshold | ||
if((currentUptime - previousUptime) * 100 / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration > UPTIME_REWARDS_THRESHOLD_PERCENTAGE) { | ||
return weight; | ||
} | ||
// Calculate effective weight based on both weight and time period | ||
return (weight * (currentUptime - previousUptime)) / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration; | ||
} |
Check warning
Code scanning / Slither
Dangerous strict equalities Medium
Native721TokenStakingManager._calculateEffectiveWeight(uint256,uint64,uint64) uses a dangerous strict equality:
- previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0
- previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0
Comment on lines
+716
to
+731
function _calculateEffectiveWeight( | ||
uint256 weight, | ||
uint64 currentUptime, | ||
uint64 previousUptime | ||
) internal view returns (uint256) { | ||
if(previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0) { | ||
return 0; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Return full weight if uptime is above threshold | ||
if((currentUptime - previousUptime) * 100 / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration > UPTIME_REWARDS_THRESHOLD_PERCENTAGE) { | ||
return weight; | ||
} | ||
// Calculate effective weight based on both weight and time period | ||
return (weight * (currentUptime - previousUptime)) / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration; | ||
} |
Check notice
Code scanning / Slither
Block timestamp Low
Native721TokenStakingManager._calculateEffectiveWeight(uint256,uint64,uint64) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0
- (currentUptime - previousUptime) * 100 / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration > UPTIME_REWARDS_THRESHOLD_PERCENTAGE
Dangerous comparisons:
- previousUptime > currentUptime || currentUptime == 0
- (currentUptime - previousUptime) * 100 / _getStakingManagerStorage()._epochDuration > UPTIME_REWARDS_THRESHOLD_PERCENTAGE
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
How this works
How this was tested
How is this documented