Skip to content

meta-security dunfell fails to produce FAPI files #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kuldeepmarker-eaton opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

meta-security dunfell fails to produce FAPI files #5

kuldeepmarker-eaton opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@kuldeepmarker-eaton
Copy link

HI All,

I have used meta-security as a layer and I intend to make use of the meta-tpm. I am able to build properly using yocto but I am not seeing FAPI related files when tpm-tss recipe is build. I can see that ESYS API and SAPI files are there in the build folder of tpm2-tss. So what is needed to generate FAPI files

@amstewart
Copy link

Hey @kuldeepmarker-eaton,

NI doesn't actually use the meta-tpm sub-layer within meta-security in our NI LinuxRT builds. So we don't have expertise in how the tpm2-tss recipe within that layer is designed.

I see you opened a similar issue in meta-secure-core. Are you trying to integrate TPM2 user-space tools into an NI LinuxRT deployment, or into your own OE distribution? If the former, I'd be happy to talk about your use-case and get an understanding of your requirements.

Either way, you might want to open an issue with the meta-security upstream maintainers on the yocto mailing list <yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org>. It seems that the yocto project has expected the FAPI configuration switch for tpm2-tss to work at some point in the past.

@kuldeepmarker-eaton
Copy link
Author

HI @amstewart ,

Thanks for a quick reply. I am trying to integrate TPM2 user space tools into ST Openstlinux distro. And I want to use FAPI API to interact with TPM. I will create an issue regarding this.

@amstewart
Copy link

Ah; I see. The yocto mailing list is probably your best bet for an answer then.

I'll go ahead and close this issue. Let me know if you have any objections.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants