Pr advanced display #124
Pr advanced display #124
Conversation
|
Hi, I am a code reviewer bot. I will analyze the PR and provide detailed review comments. |
| completion = client.beta.chat.completions.parse( | ||
| model="gpt-4o-2024-08-06", | ||
| messages=[ | ||
| {"role": "system", "content": "You are an experienced code reviewer."}, | ||
| {"role": "user", "content": prompt} | ||
| ], | ||
| response_format=ReviewModel, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Missing error handling for API call. Add try/catch block around the API call and log any exceptions.
Severity: error
Suggestion: Wrap the API call in a try/except block to handle potential exceptions and log them appropriately.
try:
completion = client.beta.chat.completions.parse(
model="gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are an experienced code reviewer."},
{"role": "user", "content": prompt}
],
response_format=ReviewModel,
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error during API call: {str(e)}")
raise
| def parse_diff_file_line_numbers(diff_content: str) -> List[Dict]: | ||
| """ | ||
| Parse a unified diff string and return a structured list of changes using | ||
| actual file line numbers. | ||
|
|
||
| Returns a list of dicts, each representing a file change: | ||
| { | ||
| "file_name": str, | ||
| "changes": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "added" | "removed" | "context", | ||
| "line_number": int, # For added or context lines, this is target_line_no. | ||
| # For removed lines, use source_line_no. | ||
| "content": str | ||
| }, | ||
| ... | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| """ | ||
| patch = PatchSet(diff_content) | ||
| parsed_files = [] | ||
|
|
||
| for patched_file in patch: | ||
| file_info = { | ||
| "file_name": patched_file.path, | ||
| "changes": [] | ||
| } | ||
| for hunk in patched_file: | ||
| for line in hunk: | ||
| # Decide which line number to use based on change type. | ||
| if line.is_added or not line.is_removed: | ||
| line_num = line.target_line_no | ||
| else: | ||
| line_num = line.source_line_no | ||
|
|
||
| if line_num is None: | ||
| continue # Skip lines without a valid number | ||
|
|
||
| # Append each changed line along with its file-based line number. | ||
| file_info["changes"].append({ | ||
| "type": "added" if line.is_added else "removed" if line.is_removed else "context", | ||
| "line_number": line_num, | ||
| "content": line.value.rstrip("\n") | ||
| }) | ||
| parsed_files.append(file_info) | ||
|
|
||
| return parsed_files | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Missing error handling for diff parsing. Add try/catch block around the parsing logic and log any exceptions.
Severity: error
Suggestion: Wrap the parsing logic in a try/except block to handle exceptions and log them.
def parse_diff_file_line_numbers(diff_content: str) -> List[Dict]:
"""
Parse a unified diff string and return a structured list of changes using
actual file line numbers.
"""
try:
patch = PatchSet(diff_content)
parsed_files = []
for patched_file in patch:
file_info = {
"file_name": patched_file.path,
"changes": []
}
for hunk in patched_file:
for line in hunk:
# Decide which line number to use based on change type.
if line.is_added or not line.is_removed:
line_num = line.target_line_no
else:
line_num = line.source_line_no
if line_num is None:
continue # Skip lines without a valid number
# Append each changed line along with its file-based line number.
file_info["changes"].append({
"type": "added" if line.is_added else "removed" if line.is_removed else "context",
"line_number": line_num,
"content": line.value.rstrip("\n")
})
parsed_files.append(file_info)
return parsed_files
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error parsing diff content: {str(e)}")
raise
| WEBHOOK_SECRET = os.environ.get("WEBHOOK_SECRET") | ||
| if not WEBHOOK_SECRET: | ||
| raise ValueError("WEBHOOK_SECRET not set") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Missing logging for critical exceptions. Add logging to capture when environment variables are missing.
Severity: warning
Suggestion: Add logging to capture when critical environment variables are missing.
if not WEBHOOK_SECRET:
print("Critical: WEBHOOK_SECRET environment variable is not set.")
raise ValueError("WEBHOOK_SECRET not set")
| def generate_hash_signature(secret: bytes, payload: bytes, digest_method=hashlib.sha1): | ||
| return hmac.new(secret, payload, digest_method).hexdigest() | ||
|
|
||
| def verify_signature(payload: bytes, x_hub_signature: str): | ||
| secret = WEBHOOK_SECRET.encode("utf-8") | ||
| expected_signature = f"sha1={generate_hash_signature(secret, payload)}" | ||
| if not hmac.compare_digest(expected_signature, x_hub_signature): | ||
| raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Invalid webhook signature") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Unused functions - These functions are defined but not used within the module, potentially leading to dead code.
Severity: info
Suggestion: Remove unused functions or ensure they are called appropriately within the module.
| def create_check_run(repo, sha): | ||
| """Create a check run using the modern PyGithub API""" | ||
| return repo.create_check_run( | ||
| name="AI Code Review", | ||
| head_sha=sha, | ||
| status="queued", # Initial status should be 'queued' | ||
| output={ | ||
| "title": "Analyzing Changes", | ||
| "summary": "🔍 Scanning code changes with AI...", | ||
| "text": "This may take 20-30 seconds" | ||
| } | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Initial check run status - The initial status is set to 'queued' but should consider starting with 'in_progress' for better status transition clarity.
Severity: info
Suggestion: Consider starting the initial check run status with 'in_progress' for better clarity in status transitions.
def create_check_run(repo, sha):
"""Create a check run using the modern PyGithub API"""
return repo.create_check_run(
name="AI Code Review",
head_sha=sha,
status="in_progress", # Initial status should be 'in_progress'
output={
"title": "Analyzing Changes",
"summary": "🔍 Scanning code changes with AI...",
"text": "This may take 20-30 seconds"
}
)
| # Prepare the prompt for the LLM | ||
| prompt = f""" | ||
| Analyze the following code changes and provide detailed review comments. | ||
| Focus on: | ||
| - Code quality and best practices | ||
| - Potential security vulnerabilities | ||
| - Performance implications | ||
|
|
||
| Important: | ||
| - Provide insights in the comment section for each code segment. Provide improvements in suggestions when necessary. | ||
| - Always output the codeSegmentToFix in the diff format (e.g., '+ added code', '- removed code', 'or nothing for normal code'). | ||
| - If there is a new line in the codeSegmentToFix (when there are multiple lines), you MUST indicate it with the new line symbol. | ||
| - Ensure that you provide all the necessary code lines in the codeSegmentToFix field. | ||
| - If there are multiple comments for the same code segment, provide the comments separated by commas. | ||
|
|
||
| CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: | ||
| - Precisely mention the position where the comment should be placed. | ||
| - The codeSegmentToFix should exactly start from the start_line_with_prefix and end at the end_line_with_prefix. | ||
| - Use the file-based line numbers provided in the structured diff below. | ||
| - You MUST provide exact start_line_with_prefix and end_line_with_prefix numbers for each comment. | ||
| - Never omit line numbers or the system will fail. | ||
|
|
||
| Examples for start_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from new file: "+5, +2, +51, +61" | ||
| Examples for start_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from old file: "-8, -1, -56, -20" | ||
|
|
||
| Examples for end_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from new file: "+10, +2, +77, +65" | ||
| Examples for end_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from old file: "-1, -5, -22, -44" | ||
|
|
||
| Diff content: | ||
| {structured_diff_text} | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Complex prompt string - The prompt string is very long and complex, making it hard to maintain and modify. Consider breaking it into smaller parts or using a different approach to build the prompt.
Severity: info
Suggestion: Break the prompt string into smaller parts or use a different approach to build the prompt for better maintainability.
prompt_intro = """
Analyze the following code changes and provide detailed review comments.
Focus on:
- Code quality and best practices
- Potential security vulnerabilities
- Performance implications
Important:
- Provide insights in the comment section for each code segment. Provide improvements in suggestions when necessary.
- Always output the codeSegmentToFix in the diff format (e.g., '+ added code', '- removed code', 'or nothing for normal code').
- If there is a new line in the codeSegmentToFix (when there are multiple lines), you MUST indicate it with the new line symbol.
- Ensure that you provide all the necessary code lines in the codeSegmentToFix field.
- If there are multiple comments for the same code segment, provide the comments separated by commas.
"""
prompt_critical = """
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:
- Precisely mention the position where the comment should be placed.
- The codeSegmentToFix should exactly start from the start_line_with_prefix and end at the end_line_with_prefix.
- Use the file-based line numbers provided in the structured diff below.
- You MUST provide exact start_line_with_prefix and end_line_with_prefix numbers for each comment.
- Never omit line numbers or the system will fail.
"""
prompt_examples = """
Examples for start_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from new file: "+5, +2, +51, +61"
Examples for start_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from old file: "-8, -1, -56, -20"
Examples for end_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from new file: "+10, +2, +77, +65"
Examples for end_line_with_prefix when the start_line is from old file: "-1, -5, -22, -44"
Diff content:
{structured_diff_text}
"""
prompt = f"{prompt_intro}{prompt_critical}{prompt_examples}"
| installation_id = github_integration.get_installation(owner, repo_name).id | ||
| access_token = github_integration.get_access_token(installation_id).token | ||
| return Github(login_or_token=access_token).get_repo(f"{owner}/{repo_name}") | ||
|
|
||
| @app.post("/webhook") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: Missing docstring - The webhook function lacks a docstring, making it harder for developers to understand its purpose and functionality.
Severity: info
Suggestion: Add a docstring to the webhook function to describe its purpose and functionality.
@app.post("/webhook")
async def webhook(request: Request, x_hub_signature: str = Header(None)):
"""
Handle incoming webhook requests from GitHub.
This function verifies the webhook signature, processes the payload to
determine if it is a pull request event, and initiates a code review
process if applicable.
Args:
request (Request): The incoming request object.
x_hub_signature (str): The signature header from GitHub for verification.
Returns:
dict: An empty dictionary as a response.
"""
| print("Before API CALL...") | ||
|
|
||
| # Get analysis from OpenAI | ||
| completion = client.beta.chat.completions.parse( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: The OpenAI model name is incorrect. The correct model name should be 'gpt-4o' or another valid OpenAI model name. The current name 'gpt-4o-2024-08-06' is not a valid model name provided by OpenAI.
Severity: error
Suggestion: Update the model name to a valid OpenAI model name such as 'gpt-4o'.
model="gpt-4o"
No description provided.