docs: Mention --disable-sigusr1 in getting started guide

[dreusel]

Description

Mention --disable-sigusr1 in getting started guide

Validation

I took it from the node.js documentation site (https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#--disable-sigusr1)

Related Issues

None so far

Check List

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
• I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
• I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing.
• I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors.
• I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jun 16, 2025 2:41am

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the getting started guide by adding an entry for the --disable-sigusr1 flag in the debugging table.

• Added documentation for the --disable-sigusr1 flag
• Provides version details indicating when the flag was introduced

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

apps/site/pages/en/learn/getting-started/debugging.md:132

• Consider listing versions in ascending order (e.g., v22.14.0, v23.7.0) for improved clarity and consistency with other version notations.

| --disable-sigusr1                  | Disable the ability of starting a debugging session by sending a SIGUSR1 signal to the process (since Node v23.7.0, v22.14.0).                        |

[avivkeller]

That's a little advanced for beginners, no?

[dreusel]

That's a little advanced for beginners, no?

Possibly so. I landed on the page as a non-beginner and it would have helped me, but I could imagine the maintainer not adding it for your reason.
The reason it would have helped me is perhaps also a bit of a temporary sitation: As the flag is quite new it doesn't easily pop up in searches and various AI's will just tell you that it's not possible to completely disable the debugger functionality.

[avivkeller]

I mean, it is a beginner page, but it doesn't hurt to add the flag, so LGTM. It's not like we are over complicating it, it's a single table entry

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.43%. Comparing base (f93bd4b) to head (dc2eee4).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7857   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.43%   75.43%           
=======================================
  Files         101      101           
  Lines        8305     8306    +1     
  Branches      218      218           
=======================================
+ Hits         6265     6266    +1     
  Misses       2038     2038           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Results

URL	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Report
/en	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/about	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 100	🟠 82	🔗
/en/about/previous-releases	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 100	🟠 83	🔗
/en/download	🟢 98	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/blog	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 92	🔗