You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working with datasets that contain more labeled images than unlabeled. In my experiments with default settings, it seems that the generator struggles to learn the input, and images can be quite noisy. Is there a reason for this? From what I can tell, more labels should not harm the generator but I may be wrong.
This is for single class images with very little background, as they are cropped to the height and width of the desired object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @pcicales , thank you for your interests in our work. Could you share an example of your image label pairs? With more labelled data, it should learn a better joint distribution. It is likely the data processing step is wrong.
Hello
I am working with datasets that contain more labeled images than unlabeled. In my experiments with default settings, it seems that the generator struggles to learn the input, and images can be quite noisy. Is there a reason for this? From what I can tell, more labels should not harm the generator but I may be wrong.
This is for single class images with very little background, as they are cropped to the height and width of the desired object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: