feat: close sidebar on mobile after selecting a unit

[Agrendalath]

Description

When a user selects a unit on the course outline sidebar, it remains open. This behavior can be confusing on mobile devices because the sidebar is displayed on the entire screen. This PR changes the behavior to close the sidebar once the learner selects the unit.

Testing instructions

1. Ensure you have enabled the courseware.enable_navigation_sidebar Waffle flag.
2. Open any course unit on a mobile device.
3. Open the sidebar on the left side.
4. Select any unit and check that the sidebar was closed afterward.

Private-ref: BB-334 (temporary)

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @Agrendalath!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-frontend-app-learning.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.66%. Comparing base (fca32ae) to head (661a3ac).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1583   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.65%   84.66%           
=======================================
  Files         332      332           
  Lines        5683     5685    +2     
  Branches     1359     1360    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         4811     4813    +2     
  Misses        855      855           
  Partials       17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bradenmacdonald]

Makes sense to me! If you haven't already, can you just get a +1 from some product person, perhaps by asking on Slack #studio ?

[Agrendalath]

@bradenmacdonald, I posted a request on the #wg-product-core channel, as I couldn't find anything closer to the Learning MFE. Do you suggest posting it on the #studio channel, too?

[crathbun428]

Thank you for catching. This updated behavior makes sense to me.

[itsjeyd]

@Agrendalath Friendly nudge to resolve conflicts here.

[Agrendalath]

@itsjeyd, I'll do this in the next sprint, as the rebase will require manual changes and re-testing after the refactor from #1586, which moved the related code around the repo.

[marcotuts]

+100 to this, I just tested this on the sandbox and it makes general movement between units difficult without this fix! I knew this context and PR and still found myself confused only to remember that's what I was testing / checking :) 👍

[Agrendalath]

@itsjeyd, done.

@bradenmacdonald, could you please merge this?