You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One issue i see for w3c VCs is that issuer based matching with DCQl can become quite complex, as you don't know whether to query ['issuer'] or ['issuer', 'id'].
So if you would use claim sets, you'd have to duplicate all claim sets. I know the WG decided against adding did as a trusted authority mechanism, but it would make issuer matching a lot easier IMO.
A similar limitation is there for AnonCreds credentials, as there is not really an issuer_did property to query on.
I think adding support for DIDs to trusted authorities would make querying for DID based issuers a lot easier across credential formats that support DIDs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TimoGlastra
changed the title
Support did as trusted authorities
Support did as trusted authorities for DCQL
Apr 3, 2025
Based on a comment I initially added to #479:
A similar limitation is there for AnonCreds credentials, as there is not really an
issuer_did
property to query on.I think adding support for DIDs to trusted authorities would make querying for DID based issuers a lot easier across credential formats that support DIDs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: