Skip to content

Support did as trusted authorities for DCQL #494

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
TimoGlastra opened this issue Apr 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Support did as trusted authorities for DCQL #494

TimoGlastra opened this issue Apr 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@TimoGlastra
Copy link
Member

Based on a comment I initially added to #479:

One issue i see for w3c VCs is that issuer based matching with DCQl can become quite complex, as you don't know whether to query ['issuer'] or ['issuer', 'id'].

So if you would use claim sets, you'd have to duplicate all claim sets. I know the WG decided against adding did as a trusted authority mechanism, but it would make issuer matching a lot easier IMO.

A similar limitation is there for AnonCreds credentials, as there is not really an issuer_did property to query on.

I think adding support for DIDs to trusted authorities would make querying for DID based issuers a lot easier across credential formats that support DIDs.

@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra changed the title Support did as trusted authorities Support did as trusted authorities for DCQL Apr 3, 2025
This was referenced Apr 3, 2025
@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the 1.1 milestone Apr 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants