add security scan #114
add security scan #114
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rccrdpccl The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughThe changes update image naming conventions across several configuration files. Environment variables, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Trigger as GitHub Event
participant Runner as GitHub Actions Runner
participant Checkout as Code Checkout
participant DockerBuild as Docker Build (make docker-build-all)
participant TrivyC as Trivy Scan (Controlplane Image)
participant TrivyB as Trivy Scan (Bootstrap Image)
Trigger->>Runner: Trigger workflow on push/PR
Runner->>Checkout: Checkout repository code
Checkout-->>Runner: Provide source code
Runner->>DockerBuild: Execute Docker build command
DockerBuild-->>Runner: Docker image built (SHA tag)
Runner->>TrivyC: Run Trivy scan for controlplane image
TrivyC-->>Runner: Return scan results
Runner->>TrivyB: Run Trivy scan for bootstrap image
TrivyB-->>Runner: Return scan results
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
openshift-ci
bot
added
approved
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
from
866ebd8 to
05acb60
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (1)
14-15: Action Update: Checkout Action Version
The workflow usesactions/checkout@v3(line 15), but static analysis suggests that this version may be outdated. Consider updating to a newer version (for example,v4) to benefit from the latest improvements and compatibility fixes.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml
15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml (1)
7-7: Update: Controller Image Name Updated
ThenewNamefield is now set to
quay.io/edge-infrastructure/cluster-api-controlplane-provider-openshift-assisted
which aligns with the new naming convention. Verify that using thelatesttag here is intentional.bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml (1)
7-7: Update: Bootstrap Controller Image Name Updated
The image’snewNamehas been updated to
quay.io/edge-infrastructure/cluster-api-bootstrap-provider-openshift-assisted
to match the new naming standards. Please confirm that the associated tag remains appropriately set.bootstrap-components.yaml (1)
1-36: Consistency Check: Bootstrap Components Configuration
Although no explicit diff markers (˜) are present, the deployment configuration for the bootstrap controller is expected to reference the new image name (quay.io/edge-infrastructure/cluster-api-bootstrap-provider-openshift-assisted:latest). Ensure that any usage of the old image name is fully replaced and that related workflows (e.g. in.github/workflows/release.yaml) refer to the updated image.controlplane-components.yaml (1)
1069-1072: Update: Control Plane Container Image Updated
In the Deployment forcapi-agent-controlplanecontroller-manager, the container image has been updated from the old naming scheme to
quay.io/edge-infrastructure/cluster-api-controlplane-provider-openshift-assisted:latest.
Please verify that all downstream systems (e.g. release pipelines and deployment scripts) have been updated accordingly..github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (2)
1-13: New Workflow: Security Scan Added
A new GitHub Actions workflow namedbuildhas been introduced. It sets the environment variableCONTAINER_TAGto the current GitHub SHA and runs two Trivy vulnerability scans (one for controlplane and one for bootstrap images). This implementation helps ensure that critical and high-severity vulnerabilities are caught before deployment.
16-35: Security Scan Steps Verification
The steps that run the Trivy vulnerability scanner (lines 18–26 for the controlplane image and lines 27–35 for the bootstrap image) are correctly configured with parameters such asformat,exit-code,ignore-unfixed,vuln-type, andseverity. Confirm that an exit code of1is appropriate to fail the workflow when critical or high vulnerabilities are detected..github/workflows/release.yaml (3)
13-14: Environment Variables Updated for New Image Naming Convention
The new environment variable values forcontrolplane_image_nameandbootstrap_image_namecorrectly reflect the updated naming scheme. Ensure these variables are consistently used across all steps in the workflow.
29-30: Updated sed Commands to Use New Image Names
The sed commands have been modified to replace the old image identifiers with the new ones using the specified environment variables. This change should correctly update the image tags in your manifest files during release.
1-62: Review Note on Security Scan Integration
Although the PR title and objectives mention adding a security scan, this workflow file focuses on release steps and image tagging. Please ensure that the new GitHub Actions workflow for security scanning (or corresponding steps) is present and correctly integrated in another file.Makefile (2)
4-4: Updated Container Repository Naming
The variableCONTAINER_REPOSITORYon line 4 now uses the new naming standard (cluster-api-$(PROVIDER)-provider-openshift-assisted). This update aligns with the new image naming convention applied in the release workflow.
105-109: Consistent Image Tagging in Docker Build/Push Targets
The targets forprovider-docker-build(line 105) andprovider-docker-push(line 109) have been updated to reference the new repository name format. This change is consistent with other parts of the build pipeline. Double-check that any downstream scripts or deployment configurations use the updated image names.
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
from
05acb60 to
32e079c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (2)
1-7: Workflow Trigger Configuration:
The workflow’s trigger settings are correctly defined, with push events filtered to the master branch and pull requests included. If additional branches should be scanned, consider updating the branch filter accordingly.
16-19: Step Naming Clarification:
There are two sequential steps with the name "Build an image from Dockerfile." The first step (lines 16-17) correctly builds the Docker image viamake docker-build-all, while the second step (lines 18-19) lists images usingpodman image ls. Renaming the second step (e.g., to "List built images") would improve clarity and avoid confusion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- bootstrap-components.yaml
- .github/workflows/release.yaml
- controlplane-components.yaml
- Makefile
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (4)
8-12: Job Setup and Environment Variable:
The build job is properly configured to run on Ubuntu 24.04, and the environment variableCONTAINER_TAGis correctly set using${{ github.sha }}.
13-15: Checkout Step Verification:
The step for checking out the code usingactions/checkout@v4is set up appropriately.
20-28: Controlplane Trivy Scan:
The configuration for running the Trivy vulnerability scanner on the controlplane image is well defined. Theimage-refcorrectly incorporates the GitHub SHA, and parameters for output format, exit-code behavior, vulnerability types, and severity are appropriately set. Just ensure that the built image is tagged as expected.
29-37: Bootstrap Trivy Scan:
The bootstrap image scan is configured similarly to the controlplane scan and appears correct. As with the previous scanner, verify that the image reference aligns with the actual built image.
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
2 times, most recently
from
74546c1 to
0ebef3f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (3)
8-12: Job Definition and Environment Variable Setup
The job is defined with the name"Security scan"and runs onubuntu-24.04, with the environment variableCONTAINER_TAGcorrectly set to${{ github.sha }}. For enhanced clarity, consider renaming the job’s identifier frombuildto something more descriptive, such assecurity_scan.
18-19: Step Naming Clarification for Image Listing
The step is currently named"Build an image from Dockerfile"but executespodman image ls, which actually lists the built images rather than building them. To avoid confusion, consider renaming this step to"List built images".Suggested change:
- - name: Build an image from Dockerfile + - name: List built images
33-41: Trivy Scanner for Bootstrap with Version Discrepancy
This step scans the bootstrap image usingaquasecurity/trivy-action@0.28.0, and it outputs results in table format with an exit code of1if vulnerabilities are detected. The use of a different version (0.28.0) and output format compared to the controlplane scanner (which uses 0.30.0 and SARIF) raises a question: Is this discrepancy intentional? If not, consider aligning the version and possibly the output format between the two scans for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks).trivy.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .trivy.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- bootstrap-components.yaml
- controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- controlplane-components.yaml
- .github/workflows/release.yaml
- Makefile
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Security scan
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (6)
1-1: Workflow Naming is Clear
The workflow name"security-scan"clearly represents its purpose.
2-7: Trigger Configuration Review
The workflow is triggered on pushes to themasterbranch and on pull requests. Please verify thatmasteris indeed your repository’s default branch—if you've transitioned to a branch likemain, this configuration should be updated accordingly.
14-15: Checkout Step is Standard
The step usingactions/checkout@v4correctly checks out the repository code.
16-17: Image Build Step Using Makefile
The step"Build an image from Dockerfile"callsmake docker-build-all, which should build the images as per the updated image naming conventions. Please ensure that the Makefile has been updated in line with the new image names.
20-27: Trivy Scanner for Controlplane
This step usesaquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0to scan the controlplane image and outputs results in SARIF format, which is appropriate for integration with GitHub’s security features. The parameters (ignoring unfixed vulnerabilities, specifying vulnerability types, and filtering by severity) are well configured for scanning critical and high-severity issues.
28-32: SARIF Upload Step for Security Results
The step that uploads the scan results usinggithub/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3is correctly configured, including the use ofif: always()to ensure that results are uploaded regardless of the scan outcome.
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
3 times, most recently
from
6497543 to
a4aaf3f
Compare
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
from
a4aaf3f to
f262bc7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (2)
1-6: Verify Branch Trigger ConfigurationThe workflow triggers on pushes to the branch
masterand on pull requests. Ensure that usingmasteris intentional (and notmainor another branch) based on your repository’s branch naming conventions.
29-33: Bootstrap Vulnerability Scan: Version Consistency ConsiderationThe bootstrap scanner uses
aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.28.0which differs from the controlplane scan version (0.30.0). If this version difference is intentional, please disregard; otherwise, consider aligning the versions to ensure consistency in vulnerability assessment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks).trivy.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- .trivy.yaml
- bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- .github/workflows/release.yaml
- bootstrap-components.yaml
- controlplane-components.yaml
- Makefile
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Security scan
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (4)
7-13: Job and Environment Configuration Looks SolidThe job definition under
jobs: build:is clear with the environment variables and the use ofubuntu-24.04. The setting ofCONTAINER_TAGbased on${{ github.sha }}andCONTAINER_TOOLasdockeris appropriate.
15-18: Checkout and Docker Build Steps are AppropriateThe steps to checkout the code using
actions/checkout@v4and building images viamake docker-build-allare well defined. Just ensure that themake docker-build-alltarget correctly interprets any changes from the updated image naming conventions.
19-23: Controlplane Vulnerability Scan is Configured CorrectlyThe Trivy action for scanning the controlplane image (using
aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0) is set up with the correct image reference and configuration file. This integration should help in detecting container vulnerabilities effectively.
24-28: Uploading SARIF Results for Controlplane ScanThe step for uploading the Trivy scan results using
github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3is properly configured withif: always()and the specified SARIF file.
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fe8434c to
6abab06
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (1)
28-33: Trivy Scanner for Bootstrap Version ConsistencyThis step is similar to the controlplane scanner but uses
aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.28.0. For consistency in scanning behavior and output formatting between components, consider aligning the Trivy action version across both steps.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks).trivy.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .trivy.yaml
- bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- .github/workflows/release.yaml
- controlplane-components.yaml
- bootstrap-components.yaml
- Makefile
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (6)
1-7: Workflow Trigger ConfigurationThe
on:event configuration correctly triggers on pushes to themasterbranch and pull requests. Consider verifying if additional branches (e.g.,main) should be included, depending on your repository’s branching strategy.
8-14: Job Definition and Environment VariablesThe job "Security scan" is well-defined for an Ubuntu 24.04 runner. The environment variables (
CONTAINER_TAGandCONTAINER_TOOL) are appropriately set to be used in subsequent steps.
15-16: Checkout Code StepThe checkout action using
actions/checkout@v4is correctly set up to pull the repository code.
17-18: Docker Image Build StepThe step running
make docker-build-allcorrectly kicks off the image build process. Ensure that the corresponding Makefile targets have been updated to reflect the new image naming conventions.
19-21: Create Scans Folder StepThe use of
mkdir -p scans/to create the scans folder is a standard and effective approach.
22-27: Trivy Scanner for ControlplaneThe Trivy action is used with version
0.30.0and is properly configured with the image reference, configuration file (.trivy.yaml), and output path (scans/trivy-results-controlplane.sarif). Verify that the.trivy.yamlfile exists and contains the intended scan settings.
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
from
6abab06 to
4f8b1f4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (1)
19-21: Create Scans FolderThe step creates a
scans/directory to store scan results. Consider verifying that this directory is added to your.gitignoreif it shouldn’t be tracked by Git.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/release.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/security-scan.yaml(1 hunks).trivy.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)bootstrap-components.yaml(1 hunks)bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane-components.yaml(1 hunks)controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .trivy.yaml
- bootstrap/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- controlplane/config/manager/kustomization.yaml
- bootstrap-components.yaml
- controlplane-components.yaml
- .github/workflows/release.yaml
- Makefile
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Security scan
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/security-scan.yaml (8)
1-1: Define Workflow NameThe workflow is clearly named
security-scan, which aligns well with the PR objective of adding a security scan.
2-6: Trigger ConfigurationThe workflow triggers on push events for the
masterbranch and on pull requests. This configuration follows standard CI/CD practices.
7-13: Job Environment SetupThe job named "Security scan" is correctly configured to run on
ubuntu-24.04and sets appropriate environment variables (CONTAINER_TAGandCONTAINER_TOOL).
14-16: Checkout StepThe checkout step uses
actions/checkout@v4, which is the latest stable version. No issues here.
17-18: Docker Image Build StepThe step that builds the Docker images via
make docker-build-allis succinct and assumes that the associated Makefile is correctly configured.
22-27: Trivy Scan for ControlplaneThe configuration for the controlplane scan is well defined using
aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0. The output is directed toscans/trivy-results-controlplane.sarif, which is consistent with the folder structure.
28-33: Trivy Scan for BootstrapSimilarly, the bootstrap scan is configured correctly and outputs its results to
scans/trivy-results-bootstrap.sarif.
39-43: Upload SARIF ResultsThe upload step uses
github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3with the glob patternscans/*.sarif, which should correctly pick up the scan results when the output paths are consistent across all scan steps. Once the output from the repo mode scan is adjusted, this step will function as intended.
| - name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner in repo mode | ||
| uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0 | ||
| with: | ||
| scan-type: 'fs' | ||
| output: 'trivy-results-repo.sarif' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review Output Location for Repo Mode Scan
The "Run Trivy vulnerability scanner in repo mode" step outputs its results to trivy-results-repo.sarif (line 38), which is outside the scans/ folder. Since the subsequent upload step uses the pattern scans/*.sarif, this file may be omitted from the upload. It is recommended to change the output path to scans/trivy-results-repo.sarif for consistency and to ensure all scan results are captured.
Proposed Diff:
- output: 'trivy-results-repo.sarif'
+ output: 'scans/trivy-results-repo.sarif'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner in repo mode | |
| uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0 | |
| with: | |
| scan-type: 'fs' | |
| output: 'trivy-results-repo.sarif' | |
| - name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner in repo mode | |
| uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.30.0 | |
| with: | |
| scan-type: 'fs' | |
| output: 'scans/trivy-results-repo.sarif' |
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Piccoli <rpiccoli@redhat.com>
rccrdpccl
force-pushed
the
add-security-scan
branch
from
4f8b1f4 to
dba16b3
Compare
|
Lint timed out /retest |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores