Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fill below spectral density line #276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Fill below spectral density line #276

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

dthaler
Copy link
Collaborator

@dthaler dthaler commented Feb 19, 2025

And upgrade some dependencies

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the audio channel chart on the Spectral Density page with a filled area display for improved visual clarity.
  • Chores
    • Applied minor formatting adjustments for consistent chart presentation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Spectral Density page in OrcanodeMonitor by enhancing its chart visualization. Specifically, it adds a fill: true property to the dataset configuration to fill the area under the audio channel line chart and includes a syntactical correction—a trailing comma after borderWidth: 1. The data processing and control flow remain unaffected.

Changes

File Change Summary
OrcanodeMonitor/.../SpectralDensity.cshtml Updated chart initialization: added fill: true property and a trailing comma for proper syntax.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I’m a rabbit in a code-filled glade,
Hopping over changes so neatly laid.
The charts now dance with filled delight,
A trailing comma making things just right.
With each hop, my joy is displayed! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b1d722 and 6b04a0b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OrcanodeMonitor/Pages/SpectralDensity.cshtml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • OrcanodeMonitor/Pages/SpectralDensity.cshtml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: build_windows (Release)
  • GitHub Check: build_windows (Debug)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1624ea and 6b1d722.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • OrcanodeMonitor/OrcanodeMonitor.csproj (2 hunks)
  • OrcanodeMonitor/Pages/SpectralDensity.cshtml (1 hunks)
  • Test/Test.csproj (2 hunks)
  • TransferData/TransferData.csproj (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: CodeQL
OrcanodeMonitor/OrcanodeMonitor.csproj

[error] 166-166: NETSDK1045: The current .NET SDK does not support targeting .NET 9.0. Either target .NET 8.0 or lower, or use a version of the .NET SDK that supports .NET 9.0.

TransferData/TransferData.csproj

[error] 166-166: NETSDK1045: The current .NET SDK does not support targeting .NET 9.0. Either target .NET 8.0 or lower, or use a version of the .NET SDK that supports .NET 9.0.

Test/Test.csproj

[error] 166-166: NETSDK1045: The current .NET SDK does not support targeting .NET 9.0. Either target .NET 8.0 or lower, or use a version of the .NET SDK that supports .NET 9.0.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
OrcanodeMonitor/Pages/SpectralDensity.cshtml (1)

69-70: LGTM! The changes successfully implement the fill below spectral density line.

The addition of fill: true property will fill the area below the line chart, enhancing the visualization of the spectral density data.

TransferData/TransferData.csproj (1)

10-12:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify if the CodeGeneration.Design package is needed.

The Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design package is typically used for ASP.NET Core scaffolding. Please verify if this package is required for this console application project.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any scaffolding commands or generated code exists in the project.

# Search for scaffolding commands in the codebase
rg -i "scaffold" .

Length of output: 18


Action Required: Verify necessity of the scaffolding package for this console application

It appears that no scaffolding-related keywords (e.g., "scaffold") were found in the codebase using the current search. However, since the absence of output doesn't entirely rule out the possibility of scaffolding usage, please manually verify that the Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design package isn’t being relied on anywhere in the project. Given that this is a console application—and scaffolding tools are typically used only in ASP.NET Core projects—if no scaffolding features are in use, it should be safe to remove this package.

Test/Test.csproj (1)

13-20:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify if the CodeGeneration.Design package is needed.

The Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design package is typically used for ASP.NET Core scaffolding. Please verify if this package is required for this test project.

The test package updates look good, but ensure they are compatible with .NET 8.0.

web
Are MSTest.TestAdapter 3.8.0 and MSTest.TestFramework 3.8.0 compatible with .NET 8.0?


---

🏁 Script executed:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any scaffolding commands or generated code exists in the project.

# Search for scaffolding commands in the codebase
rg -i "scaffold" .

# Check package compatibility with .NET 8.0

Length of output: 18


Action Required: Verify CodeGeneration.Design Necessity & .NET 8.0 Package Compatibility

  • In Test/Test.csproj (lines 13-20), the inclusion of the Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design package is typically warranted for ASP.NET Core scaffolding. Since the search for “scaffold” yielded no matches, it appears there are no explicit scaffolding commands or generated code present. However, please manually verify that no indirect or hidden scaffolding dependencies exist.
  • Also, confirm that the versions for MSTest packages (MSTest.TestAdapter and MSTest.TestFramework at 3.8.0) along with Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk (17.13.0) are fully compatible with .NET 8.0 in your project context.

@@ -2,11 +2,15 @@

<PropertyGroup>
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Revert to .NET 8.0 as .NET 9.0 is not yet supported.

The pipeline is failing because .NET 9.0 is not yet released and supported by the current .NET SDK. Please revert to .NET 8.0.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-    <TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
+    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>

Test/Test.csproj Outdated
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">

<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Revert to .NET 8.0 as .NET 9.0 is not yet supported.

The pipeline is failing because .NET 9.0 is not yet released and supported by the current .NET SDK. Please revert to .NET 8.0.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-    <TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
+    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web">

<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Revert to .NET 8.0 as .NET 9.0 is not yet supported.

The pipeline is failing because .NET 9.0 is not yet released and supported by the current .NET SDK. Please revert to .NET 8.0.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-    <TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
+    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
<TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
<PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets>
<IncludeAssets>runtime; build; native; contentfiles; analyzers; buildtransitive</IncludeAssets>
</PackageReference>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="8.0.6" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="9.0.0" />
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify compatibility with other EntityFramework packages.

The Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design package has been updated to version 9.0.0, but other EntityFramework packages are still on version 8.0.10. Please ensure all packages are compatible.


🌐 Web query:

Are EntityFramework Core 8.0.10 packages compatible with Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 9.0.0?

💡 Result:

EntityFramework Core 8.0.x and Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 9.x are not inherently compatible due to differing .NET runtime targets and dependency chains:

Compatibility Analysis

Package Target Framework Key Purpose
[Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore 8.0.x][3] .NET 8.x Core ORM functionality
[Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools 8.0.x][1] .NET 8.x EF Core PowerShell commands
[Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design][2] Requires .NET ≥9.x Scaffolding templates

Key Issues

  1. Framework Mismatch
    EF Core 8.x targets .NET 8 ([source][10]), while Web.CodeGeneration.Design 9.x requires minimum .NET 9 ([source][2]).

  2. Dependency Conflicts
    Attempting to combine these versions leads to:

    NU1202: Package X is not compatible with net8.0 ([search result][4])
  3. Scaffolding Limitations
    Code generation features like dotnet aspnet-codegenerator require matching major versions between:

    • EF Core Tools
    • Web.CodeGeneration.Design
    • Runtime SDK

Workarounds

1️⃣ Downgrade CodeGeneration
Use Web.CodeGeneration.Design v6.x-7.x for .NET 8 projects:

Install-Package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools -Version 8.0.*
Install-Package Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design -Version 7.*

2️⃣ Upgrade Entire Stack
Migrate to EF Core ≥9.x and Web.CodeGeneration ≥9.x if using .NET ≥9.

3️⃣ Scaffold Separately
Use cross-platform EF CLI tools instead of Visual Studio integration:

dotnet ef dbcontext scaffold "ConnectionString" Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer

Citations:


Action Required: Resolve Package Version Mismatch

After performing the compatibility check, we’ve determined that using Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 9.0.0 with EntityFramework Core 8.0.10 packages creates a runtime and dependency conflict. Specifically, the CodeGeneration.Design package targets .NET 9 or higher, while EF Core 8.0.x is designed for .NET 8. This discrepancy can lead to errors like NU1202.

Recommended Solutions:

  • Downgrade CodeGeneration.Design: For a project targeting .NET 8, consider downgrading the CodeGeneration.Design package to a compatible version (e.g., version 7.x).
  • Upgrade the Stack: Alternatively, if you plan to use CodeGeneration.Design 9.x, upgrade all related EntityFramework packages to version 9.x and adjust your project’s target framework to .NET 9 or later.

Example Diff:

-    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="9.0.0" />
+    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="7.x" />

Please adjust the package versions accordingly to ensure a consistent and compatible dependency stack.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="9.0.0" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design" Version="7.x" />

Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
@dthaler dthaler merged commit 33f93de into main Feb 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@dthaler dthaler deleted the fill branch February 24, 2025 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant